One of the attributes that makes Silicon Valley vibrant is that we don’t worship our incumbents.
We relentlessly look for ways to disrupt them.
Clearing out old incumbents long past innovating is a win-win. It makes way for the new & they can’t compete here for talent anyway.
@adamnash
Would love to know your thoughts on the effects on housing markets /taxes/political leanings on destination cities and states as well as effect on California budget. It's about the impact outside of technology/venture capital/startups that affects most Americans.
@pamelamgust
Can’t speak to political impact. Very unhappy about losing
@Tesla
, as it was test case for bringing manufacturing back to California.
None of the announced moves seem material for the CA budget, especially given the tidal wave of capital gains taxes coming in 2020/21+.
@seanrose
I don’t think the spaceship can fly anywhere. 😉
The fruit company has no issues recruiting in Silicon Valley.
They are running out of space, and the housing crunch is real. But San Jose expansion helps.
@rkorny
Maybe you’re right and the talent in Silicon Valley is wrong. It’s possible.
But that’s why this is a win-win. Old incumbents who are just harvesting cash flow should relocate to labor markets where people prioritize that type of opportunity.
Silicon Valley doesn’t. 🤷♂️
@daniel_r_james
@brianlaungaoaeh
Absolutely. They have to earn it every cycle. Look at A16Z & KPCB for example. There are over 1000 new seed funds in the last 5-7 years.
@adamnash
It’s tough to lose sleep over the departures when I’m more excited for what will replace these entrenched sloths.
It’s winter now, but soon it’ll be spring, and the cycle will begin anew.
@adamnash
But what about the new breed of ‘incumbents’ like Google, Salesforce, Microsoft et al, who stifle innovation by acquiring or crushing disrupters? I don’t call that vibrant.