@adamnash
Adam Nash
4 years
One of the attributes that makes Silicon Valley vibrant is that we don’t worship our incumbents. We relentlessly look for ways to disrupt them. Clearing out old incumbents long past innovating is a win-win. It makes way for the new & they can’t compete here for talent anyway.
16
19
313

Replies

@salwilliam
Sal
4 years
@adamnash The ethos is carrying on around the world. But in SV isn't just FB and Google and Salesforce et. al just gobbling everything up?
1
0
0
@adamnash
Adam Nash
4 years
@salwilliam Nope. More new companies than ever, and far more than any other geography.
1
0
5
@pamelamgust
Pamela Gust
4 years
@adamnash Would love to know your thoughts on the effects on housing markets /taxes/political leanings on destination cities and states as well as effect on California budget. It's about the impact outside of technology/venture capital/startups that affects most Americans.
1
0
0
@adamnash
Adam Nash
4 years
@pamelamgust Can’t speak to political impact. Very unhappy about losing @Tesla , as it was test case for bringing manufacturing back to California. None of the announced moves seem material for the CA budget, especially given the tidal wave of capital gains taxes coming in 2020/21+.
1
1
5
@seanrose
Sean Rose
4 years
@adamnash <Apple has entered the chat>
1
0
5
@adamnash
Adam Nash
4 years
@seanrose I don’t think the spaceship can fly anywhere. 😉 The fruit company has no issues recruiting in Silicon Valley. They are running out of space, and the housing crunch is real. But San Jose expansion helps.
0
0
3
@rkorny
Rob Kornblum
4 years
@adamnash Only $130B of revenue. Customers sure think those companies aren’t competitive.
1
0
1
@adamnash
Adam Nash
4 years
@rkorny Maybe you’re right and the talent in Silicon Valley is wrong. It’s possible. But that’s why this is a win-win. Old incumbents who are just harvesting cash flow should relocate to labor markets where people prioritize that type of opportunity. Silicon Valley doesn’t. 🤷‍♂️
1
0
1
@daniel_r_james
Dan James
4 years
@adamnash @brianlaungaoaeh Does that include VC incumbents?
1
0
0
@adamnash
Adam Nash
4 years
@daniel_r_james @brianlaungaoaeh Absolutely. They have to earn it every cycle. Look at A16Z & KPCB for example. There are over 1000 new seed funds in the last 5-7 years.
1
0
1
@dflanegan
Dan Flanegan
4 years
@adamnash I googled “old incumbent”...
0
0
1
@omarshaikdev
Omar Shaik
4 years
@adamnash It’s tough to lose sleep over the departures when I’m more excited for what will replace these entrenched sloths. It’s winter now, but soon it’ll be spring, and the cycle will begin anew.
0
0
5
@auren
Auren Hoffman
4 years
@adamnash what's crazy is that the "incumbents" can be less than ten years old
0
0
2
@karagoldin
Kara Goldin 🍓
4 years
0
0
1
@pemullen
Peter Mullen🎚 🏎
4 years
@adamnash But what about the new breed of ‘incumbents’ like Google, Salesforce, Microsoft et al, who stifle innovation by acquiring or crushing disrupters? I don’t call that vibrant.
0
0
0
@adamnash
Adam Nash
4 years
@jdh Oracle. HP Enterprise. Cisco.
2
0
12
@KartheeMadasamy
Karthee Madasamy
4 years
@adamnash In fact, this is the singular feature of Silicon Valley that enables itself to reinvent so many times without ever getting stagnated.
1
1
3
@adamnash
Adam Nash
4 years
@koberg True. @Tesla @SpaceX very concerning, although locating manufacturing in California is a hard case to make right now...
0
0
2