How to ace your PhD thesis defence. My Questions and Answers Guide ↓

PhDs finishing in 5+ years lack top research questions. They should have asked simpler questions. Some doctoral students spend six months on questions. (They could have started collecting data in week three.) The process is not that complicated. We just make it complicated to

Don't know how to code? No problem. Caffeine turns your ideas into launch-ready apps — just by chatting. Start for free →

How to critique things

My first acceptance after many rejections taught me: The paper wasn't accepted because I finally found the right journal. Rejection made it worthy of acceptance. Version 1: My idea, unclear Version 2: Clearer, but weak evidence Version 3: Stronger evidence, but poor framing

PhD defense mindset shift: Stop thinking: "I hope they don't notice..." Start thinking: "Let me show them I noticed first..."

The city was broke—but not broken. Drop Dead City, the 2025 documentary about NYC’s 1975 fiscal crisis, is out now. Don’t miss this smart, gripping and unexpectedly poignant story of urban survival, now streaming on all major platforms!

You can't flip from status meeting to standup overnight. Your team will revolt. They mistake talking for progress. I used to force it, too. It failed. Now I use this shadow system to change the culture in 6 weeks: Week 1-2: Shadow System. Week 3-4: Hybrid Mode. Week 5:

Share this with the PhD student in your lab who's been iterating their question for eight months or more. Every week I send one framework like this to 12,879 research leaders who are done overthinking and ready to ship. No theory. Just systems you can use before Friday. →

The students who finish their PhDs in five years don't have better questions. They have simpler questions that they can execute. Stop trying to solve world hunger. Start trying to answer: • one specific thing • about one specific group • under one specific condition.

5. Test it before you commit Run three checks: 1. So what? Does the answer matter to anyone besides you? 2. Reality check: Can you finish this with your actual budget, timeline, and skills? 3. Clarity: If you showed this to a colleague, would they know exactly what you're

Get clear, healthy-looking nails with podiatrist recommended NONYX. NONYX is clinically proven for fungus damaged and discolored, thick, brittle, yellow and lifted nails. 90% of nails improve using NONYX. So effective its money-back guaranteed.

4. Write it as a sentence Good questions don't start with "Is" or "Does." They start with "How" or "What" or "Why." If you're stuck, fill in this template: "I'm studying [Topic] because I want to find out [Question] to help my reader understand [Significance]." One sentence.

3. Narrow it until it hurts Climate Change is not a research question. It's a Wikipedia category. Use the question words: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Turn "School violence" into "How does bullying affect grades of middle school students in rural areas?" The narrower,

2. Read until you find the gap You can't ask a new question if you don't know what's already answered. Spend two weeks reading recent papers in your topic. The shortcut: jump to Limitations or Future Research. Authors hand you a to-do list of unsolved problems. That's your

1. Pick a topic you actually care about Research takes years. If you choose something because it sounds impressive, you'll hate yourself by month six. Follow your energy. What do you read when nobody's watching? What problems make you angry? That's your starting point. Not

Magnesiacore – The True Marine Wallboard for Indoor Pools and Ceilings For indoor pools, natatoriums, and other enclosed spaces with constant humidity and chemical-laden moisture, you need a construction board built to endure these harsh conditions.

PhDs finishing in 5+ years lack top research questions. They should have asked simpler questions. Some doctoral students spend six months on questions. (They could have started collecting data in week three.) The process is not that complicated. We just make it complicated to

Three types of #ux issues researchers encounter in their daily work: • Operational: The UI is clearly broken or incomprehensible. • Tactical: Problems matching the user's mental model. • Strategic: Your solution provides no value to the user. Rethink your objectives.

Turn crushing rejection into your biggest career catalyst for free here: https://t.co/uNxrQL1Ny3

My first acceptance after many rejections taught me: The paper wasn't accepted because I finally found the right journal. Rejection made it worthy of acceptance. Version 1: My idea, unclear Version 2: Clearer, but weak evidence Version 3: Stronger evidence, but poor framing

Support orphans in need

This isn't just strategy. It's the difference between: student thinking and researcher thinking. Your committee is looking for evidence of that transition. Give it to them proactively. Turn thesis flaws into researcher power moves with my FREE guide: https://t.co/fWINVz9FqE

PhD defense mindset shift: Stop thinking: "I hope they don't notice..." Start thinking: "Let me show them I noticed first..."

More grants. More papers. Less time rewriting your team's drafts. I send one system like this every week to 12,879 PIs who don't have time for nonsense. Join here →

Week 6+: Optimization Hit 20 minutes hard stop. If someone needs more than 60 seconds, say "Let's park that for a working session." Capture it in dashboard as separate task. Resistance will come from people who mistake talking for progress. Don't argue. Show results after 4

AI agents aren’t failing for lack of IQ—they’re failing for lack of context. The winners will nail the context layer: clear objectives, permission-aware access to the right content, and workflow-specific tools. Build agents that know your business, not just the internet.