Aayush Singh
@aayush_sin60488
Followers
751
Following
11K
Media
292
Statuses
3K
History enthusiast | Snippet Poster | Aesthetics Pilled
Joined July 2023
Check Citation 2 in the snippet, for Gogiraja, and what's the translation mistake was.
0
0
2
Rashtrakuta dynasty ruling at Kannauj in that time era. It's very likely they have simply forged that genealogy , although it can't be said with certainty.
1
0
9
mentioned as in outright wrong. For instance Progenitor of the line , in which Barappa belonged is said to have married daughter of Rashtrakuta king of Kannauj . Now Barappa reign is started 1070's , then the founder must have been quite older than that. Now there was no.
2
0
7
being one. Our only lead is that Trilochanapala Inscription. Now nowhere are they themselves mentioned as Chalukyas. Only 1 Inscription is known in which they have described themselves as Chaulukyas. Even that Inscription is quite dubious , since some of the information.
1
0
8
In the entire thread, u haven't shown anywhere where exactly Solankis referred themselves as Chalukyas or claimed descent from them. Another one , Gogiraja wasn't a Chalukya at all. The one who edited the inscription made a mistake, he was called feudatory of Chalukyas not him
Epigraphic and literary records pertaining that the Chaulukyas of Gujarat are synonymous with the Chalukyas of the Deccan.
4
2
22
Some people really got a hell lot of free time in this country.
0
0
14
Aside from this , we have a recently found Inscription of Chandelas from late 10th century , which furnishes information about a Certain Nishkumbha (possibly Nikumbha since the part is damaged) family , who were their generals and feudatories somewhere in Chambal or Bundelkhand
0
2
16
Various scholars have identified the first one with a Central Asian deity rather than Ganesha.
The oldest Ganesha that we know of sits on a coin from Kabul and dates back to the first century BC. The coin is in silver and was issues by Hermaeus Soter. He was one of the last Greek rulers on the Indian subcontinent before the advent of the Kushans. Do note that not all
3
1
30
Probably the earliest depiction of a Yagya (Ashvamedha ? ) done by a King named Shivghos who was ruling somewhere in Baghelkhand , 1st Century BCE.
2
35
198
@PurvBuddhaMaha Who emerged victorious is not the point. This map and the so called conquest of palas is outright fake . We have no evidence of devapala ever ruling east of parts of bihar and ample of inscriptional evidence that most of these lands were under Pratiharas.
0
0
2
Bruh what the hell is this . Regionalist chimps going seriously going wild . So many nonsense and sh8tty articles have been made on imaginary stuff with the most vaguest and in most cases no evidence at all. Anyone reading this ,plz stop referring to Wikipedia, atleast in
12
6
104
Extremely rare issue of a King named Vikrama from Ujjain city state, 1st century BCE. In all likelihood it belongs to one of the most famous Indian King "Vikramaditya".
8
43
271
The early gupta kings were also probably their samantas only.
1
0
15
Seal of Vatsa King Vijayamagha and Chandsivamagha , 1st . They ruled the area of Central and Eastern UP, bundelkhand and baghelkahnd. It was under them Kaushambi became one of the greatest cities of it's time and successfully resisted Kushan invasion
1
2
23
A Yaudheya Mahakshatrapa seal, found from Agroha , who was elected by a other members only . These oligrachies did have a proper bureaucracy
1
3
32
Seals of members of Vrishani Gana-Sangha/Janapada, one of the most celebrated kshatriya tribes of Ancient India.
1
4
38
Seal of Achutya Naga from Ahichchhatra, providing his genealogy. He was the last king of the Panchala dynasty who were ruling the area from past 500 years (200 BC- 330 AD) , with their capital at Bareilly . After his defeat by Samudragupta, the area was annexed as bhukti
6
34
184