I just published "Book 7: Inevitable", a new essay collection in the From the Diaries of John Henry essay series.

Spelling typo, replaced "a" with "of". Not expecting further edits.

What do you want to know?.

Added the essay "Sustainable Competition for Sustainable Monopolies" the the book 7 table of contents. Gametime decision. Pleased with how it turned out.

Typo fix, spelling fix “an concrete” to “a concrete”.

To confirm, every essay in the collection is a registered copyright or otherwise currently in submittal. They are all original authorship unless otherwise disclosed. I have followed practice of logging edits (mostly typo / cleanup related) in tweet threads shared to comments. :).

Ok just cleaned up the opening two paragraphs in the sustainable monopoly essay, any further edits will disclose in this thread.

I just published "Sustainable Competition for Sustainable Monopolies".

Such a great quote:. “Let’s get the money out of the hands of the lawyers and into the hands of the explorers.”.

In an era where AI becomes capable of creating, duplicating, and etc by way of inspiration of other parties, the meaningfulness of an accredited form of time stamp to any statement or action is ever so more important.

I understand that @Tesla’s driving mission is to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy. Perhaps there may be a common interest shared with those that have mission of wish to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable data center energy consumption pattern.

If you're truly seeking to work on state of the art there won't be a recommended learning curriculum, list of publications or certifications. You have to piece those together with whatever bits you can find. Industries with established credentials have already been commoditized.

I asked ChatGPT to provide feedback on my latest pair of original published essays. ChatGPT’s feedback appeared to be that these would be better writing if they closer resembled writing that was generated by ChatGPT.

Democracy without an informed electorate isn’t true democracy, perhaps one could call it populism, but even that obscures the nature of the obstruction. Without an informed electorate, you are basically holding contests of influence instead of policy.

Only in business should one seek to litigate the past. In war peaceful resolutions only come about by negotiating the future.

I get that a physicist or computer scientist that gets sufficient recognition that his inbox will be overflowing with armchair hawkings and etc that must be ignored - so how to differentiate with what needs real attention? How about it when accompanied by actual working software.

Happy approximate anniversary @automunge.

Correction typo fix to month and bolded Fini.

Added the closing pair of essays to the table of contents for book 7. No more updates.

I just published "The Difference Between SciFi and Religion". For peace.

I just published "Double Entendres", featuring my recent tweet thread on subject as well as some photography for color.

I no longer recommend that aspiring researchers attempt to participate in formal Academic venues outside of the context of a formal academic affiliation. (There was a time where prominent phd programs would claim to consider prior published papers as a qualifier for application.).