Yet Another Student
@YetAnthrStudent
Followers
2K
Following
1K
Media
370
Statuses
2K
🧔♂️ Ka'b al Ahbar-hater, Idol-smasher. I do research. Sometimes I hit, sometimes I miss. Enraged hadith absolutists call me a cockroach 🪳
Kufa
Joined May 2022
Have you ever heard of 𐩧𐩢𐩣𐩬𐩬 or Raḥmānān? It was the way Southern Arabs called God or Allah, according to archaeology and Late Sabaic inscriptions. "Al-Rahman" (الرحمن) is most probably an arabization of this name of God.
27
64
251
Les guerres idéologiques entre la Mecque/Médine (sous l'influence de Abdallah Ibn Zubayr) et le Sham ont donné ce genre d'aberrations. Quant aux fameux 27 degrés à la mosquée, il fallait absolument que les gens soient là pour avaler la soupe des conteurs https://t.co/Wo9TCoKbM4
Je viens humblement demander des explications. Aux plaisantins de s’abstenir.
1
0
0
وقالت العلماء: هذه الآية في الحرائر؛ وأما الإماء فإن عمر بن الخطاب رأى أمة عليها قناعاً فعلاها بالدرة وقال: اكشفي عن رأسك لا تتشبّهي بالحرائر. ذكروا عن أنس بن مالك قال: كُنّ جواري عمر (2) يخدمننا كاشفات رؤوسهن تضرب ثديهن، بادية خدامهن
3
1
2
Initially from the shore, one sees the pure message and core principles. Then you dive and you discover hadiths, traditional rulings, clergy and all the crazy stuff :)
Islam genuinely makes the most sense to me at the moment, however religion as a whole still feels weird to me.
2
1
13
A very useful AI prompt I urge you to try, with Claude or GPT4 for example: (try it with "clergy concept and religious authorities" for example) I wish to explore the Quran on the theme of [...], based solely on the Quranic text itself, without any reference to hadiths, tafsir,
1
3
23
This story is featured in Tahdhib al-Kamal, quoting Tarikh Al-Bukhari, but you reject it? You claim to follow hadith sciences yet reject Al-Bukhari's own methodology? Pick a side. Unlike me who came to the conclusion hadith science is a joke, you claim to respect and follow it.
@YetAnthrStudent This narration comes through Musa Ibn Yaqub. Ahmad Ibn Hanbal & Ali ibn al Madini amongst others rejected him. It’s not authentic.
7
2
22
Sleeping with your buddy and your wife, altogether under the same blanket, you say astaghfirullah I say mashallah. This is what close friendship looks like 🫶 https://t.co/OxBY3cpzgk
5
0
11
I'm not a specialist, but I recently learned about herem in Deuteronomy. This article seems balanced and highlights the tension among commentators. https://t.co/NH1HvYkvCW
thetorah.com
Of all the harsh behavior in warfare known from the ancient Near East, Deuteronomy’s requirement that Israel slaughter all the inhabitants of Canaan is unique. In all likelihood, the law sought to...
3
0
4
I'm trying to figure out what exactly is meant by "Scripture" here? What is it referring to? Any help much appreciated. https://t.co/LcjSvlRz1W
4
0
3
Meanwhile ash'aris
If you need God to tell you that it is wrong to kill people and otherwise you literally would not know that that is the case, you're either a psychpath or obviously deluding yourself. This is why I block every galaxy brain person that asks "how do you know murder is wrong?"
5
2
34
Ironic that the complainant doesn't take what you say seriously but buys into a corpus of material riddled with narrations narrated by anonymous men.
Anonymity is a fundamental pillar of freedom of expression, as long as it's not used to commit a crime. You can ignore me if you like, but I always strive to provide direct links to sources whenever I affirm something (which not many people do). You can fact-check everything I
2
3
13
Anonymity is a fundamental pillar of freedom of expression, as long as it's not used to commit a crime. You can ignore me if you like, but I always strive to provide direct links to sources whenever I affirm something (which not many people do). You can fact-check everything I
@YetAnthrStudent Then there’s no reason for anyone then to take anything you say seriously. The internet is full of anonymous cranks with axes to grind.
4
4
27
Do you want a new example showing that Nafi' based on Ibn Umar is not necessarily reliable? You will see, it is very simple to understand. Yet another paradox, and you will be able to verify it with your own eyes even if you don't know anything about hadith science. The only
14
3
29
After years of studying hadith science, I've come to the conclusion that isnad science is indeed a joke, isnads are essentially meaningless—an illusion. Here are a few reasons why: -Transformation of Reports: Interrupted (mursal/mawquf) reports are often transformed into marfu'
Isnad Science isn’t a joke. Even Da’eef Hadith is more authentic than any historical record out there including Romans, Byzantine etc. We have a virtual court system to judge the character of each narrator and probability of them actually meeting each other . No other
42
67
242
Didn't I tell you it was a classical coping mechanism?
0
0
6
Again, the problem is not his students, the problem is Nafi' himself. And if Nafi' contradicts himself that much, how can the silsilat al dhahab be automatically approved by scholars? So relying on Nafi' from Ibn 'Umar doesn't necessarily provide certainty, because Nafi' himself
4
3
24
Compared to other major transmitters from Ibn 'Umar like 'Ubaydullah and Ibn Dinar, Nafi's chains tend to suffer more frequently from defects (ʿilal), especially in the form of inexplicable variations in his immediate sources. Despite these issues, the muhaddithūn have
1
0
11
1. The theory that the same hadith could have been stated on multiple occasions by Nafi' quoting multiple sources is stupid, because why would he change his source everytime? 2. Casting doubt on the reliability of all the narrators transmitting from Nafi', rather than on Nafi'
3
0
8