It took nearly two months, but @edrybicki finally responded to my open challenge to virologists. Two others joined in as well. Did any of them present the necessary evidence or even a logical counterargument—or just more excuses and fallacious reasoning? Link in comments.

Virology redefined failure to meet Koch’s Postulates as proof of discovery—turning the absence of evidence into evidence itself. Source: https://t.co/HxK2RwFFqO AntiViral Episode 2 addresses this missing logical chain of evidence. https://t.co/W8ekCaB5dS

I have two numbers for you... $53 billion and $450 billion. That's $53 billion straight to the bottom line of Big Insurance with zero benefit to taxpayers. Some would call that fraud. And that's $450 billion more from your pockets if the Biden COVID credits are extended.

Textbooks admit Koch’s Postulates “impeded” the “discovery” of “viruses”… because they can’t be isolated or cultured independently. With no independent variable—the presumed cause—to test, virology abandoned logic and redefined science until the unproven became “discovered.”

Why do defenders of virology run from Koch’s Postulates—the very criteria virologist Ed Rybicki called the “best proof”? Because they know their fictional entity could never meet them. Source: https://t.co/KN5f5fIzfU For more on why this matters: https://t.co/qPCNgFNS7x

According to Principles of Virology, Koch’s Postulates—still considered a standard—can be applied to "viruses" to establish causation if fulfilled. Yet "viruses" are routinely labeled causal without meeting them. That’s a logical contradiction. Perfect summary of virology.

My letter to President Trumps requesting the end of all SRM funding

With trillions of "viruses" supposedly residing inside of us, they should be able to purify & isolate the particles directly from a sick host. But they say it's impossible. Where's the "virus?" Source: https://t.co/HxK2RwF7Bg For more on this dilemma: https://t.co/4cjeh2HCLx

If every "infected" cell makes millions of “infectious particles,” quantity isn’t the problem. So why has no one ever purified and isolated them directly from a sick host—no culturing needed? No logical excuse. If true, the human body would be the perfect cell culture. 🤔

For more on the relevance of Koch’s Postulates, please see this article. https://t.co/qPCNgFNS7x

Despite all the excuses, Koch’s Postulates remain the logical standard for establishing causation. Those defending virology want us to believe otherwise—because if Koch’s still apply, their entire field collapses under its own failed logic. Source: https://t.co/8IWRORhM57

“The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.” – George Orwell Truth doesn’t need validation. It needs courage.

Referencing Koch’s Postulates again, it is admitted researchers couldn’t satisfy them. Instead of accepting falsification, they assumed the “virus” must have hidden parts & began searching for new components. The Postulates falsified the hypothesis. Virologists simply rewrote it.

Here’s the Encyclopedia of Virology describing how acceptance of the tomato leaf curl “virus” required Koch’s Postulates to be conclusively satisfied. So which is it—are Koch’s Postulates obsolete, or the standard when convenient?

For those claiming Koch’s Postulates don’t apply to “viruses” & that Rivers’ Postulates replaced them—the Encyclopedia of Virology must not have received the memo. It references Koch’s Postulates multiple times, even stating they “must be fulfilled.” Rivers isn’t mentioned once.

Source: https://t.co/nJH1FTuyaO For more on the flaws of the cell culture system: https://t.co/dRJUYcqayN Step-by-step breakdown: https://t.co/QHowpUcXBV

Even virology textbooks admit it: “Virus isolation” & PCR don’t prove disease causation. They often find “viruses” in healthy people. Instead of questioning the premise, they invented “antibody” tests to save the story. When detection replaces causation, anything can be blamed.

Some men want rockets for wars. Some men want rockets for cool space shit. Someone remind me why I'm supposed to hate this guy 🤔

In “virus isolation,” stressed cultures are inoculated with an unpurified sample, then watched for degeneration. If cells round up or fuse, it’s labeled a “viral cytopathic effect.” If nothing happens, chemicals or lectins are added to force a reaction. The outcome is built in.

The cell culture in virology isn’t a clean system. It’s a mix of fetal calf serum, antibiotics, salts, sugars, & vitamins keeping stressed cells barely alive. When serum is reduced, cells degenerate—a process misread as a “viral cytopathic effect.” The setup creates the result.

Virology’s "breakthrough" wasn’t the discovery of "viruses"—it was the discovery of antibiotics. Once they could suppress bacteria in dying tissue cultures, they claimed whatever remained must be a "virus." The entire field was built on contamination control, not isolation.

When the narrative needs a scare but all the good names are taken. 🤔

We are excited to invite you to join us for a coffee and donuts open house at our practice on November 5 at 8:00 AM. This free event will provide an opportunity to meet our excellent new physician, Andrew Chambers, D.O., and learn about the unique services he brings to our

Surely a virologist with nearly 50 years of experience must have the goods. 🤔 Update 2: An Open Challenge to Virologists https://t.co/XkHcv20O6c

Source: https://t.co/90ukigFbFF For the details on how germ "theory" and virology have abandoned logic and the scientific method: 1. https://t.co/qCDUttG9r4 2. https://t.co/y2XrZrNIPQ 3. https://t.co/WHFW7nBFkV