Can we skip to the exchange endgame so I can buy securitized parlay obligations.

Machac wearing impressively tight shorts, Euro summer vibes.

I cant help but LOL at the bullposting of live liquidity while simultaneously making it impossible for a retail user to see market depth & liquidity at best price.

Liquidity is great and all but has diminishing returns above a certain threshold. Having 10/10 liquidity and 1/10 UX is far worse than 5/10 liquidity and 10/10 UX.

Never seen anything like this. Usher thought TT won at like 8-6, roughly a hundred kids ran for autographs, watched tiebreak from stairs for 15 min, and now making walk of shame out of section.

TT Krej tiebreak is must watch.

Generational run

0% chance Ohio State would be favored on a neutral there’s just no way.

Lehecka realizing he had 3 years to run around the worlds worst backhand is prob not ideal for mannarino 3rd set.

FAA Zverev one of the more enjoyable Saturday matches of the last ten years.

Aged well.

At what dog spread do you stop rooting for the tiebreak win in a 3-set match.

Cant wait to watch FSU this year. I’m sure they replaced DJU with a great passer!.

This is what happens when you don’t save 10% to double down at a better price.

Missed it on the 28th but someone wiped multiple Giannis to be traded markets from sub 15c to 35c plus. Probably not nothing….

RT @NecessaryPaper: DraftKings would veto your trade.

Nobody pitches the value of not trading against the house quite like an exchange with internal market making.

Near-term the biggest hurdle is likely buy-in from board/management on the latter approach, but imagine a consulting firm that essentially facilitates that process would do very well.

Company A hires a firm to assess the likelihood of implementation, size, and timing of tariffs. Company B seeds significant liquidity on a “What tariffs will be effectuated on X country” market. Company B gets real-time probabilities of the event, with no time lost to onboarding.

EMH has interesting ramifications in geopolitical effects outside of strictly hedging. Doesn’t seem far fetched for a multinational corporation (or govt) to allocate the $10mm they would otherwise spend on consultants to provide real liquidity to predictive markets (ie: tariffs).