RT @FedSoc: First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin asks whether federal courts must defer to state proceedings when state i….

RT @NTUF: First Choice Women’s Resource Centers v. Platkin centers on a sweeping “investigatory subpoena” that requires a pro-life pregnanc….

When a state official wants to seize a nonprofit's donor list, who bears the burden the proof? . In a friend-of-the-court brief, we explain why the government must prove it needs your information before taking it.

RT @LukePUFP: One reason I am so passionate about donor privacy for nonprofits is that individuals are much more easily pressured into keep….

State and local governments are failing a key principle of data security: don't collect what you can't protect.

Lower courts are defanging critical Supreme Court precedents that protect your right to privacy when supporting a cause. It's time for the Justices to step in.

RT @CommishSmith: The @InstFreeSpeech brief in First Choice v Platkin tells an important story about how governments use forced disclosure….

Exposing nonprofit donors isn't about "transparency." It's about pressuring Americans to stop giving to groups that politicians can't control.

State officials are abusing the subpoena power to fish for personal information about the donors and members of nonprofit organizations. The U.S. Supreme Court must stand up for privacy and end this political targeting:

The 2025 legislative sessions saw the number of states embracing donor privacy rise from 20 to 22, after Nevada and North Carolina passed the Personal Privacy Protection Act.

Democratic Party leaders keep fighting to give the government more power to monitor Americans' beliefs and suppress criticism of elected officials.

In an era of political unrest, publishing citizens' home addresses and donation records is a recipe for disaster.

Texas leaders recently missed an opportunity to shield citizens from doxing and harassment. As political tensions continue to rise, donor privacy laws will be critical for safeguarding free speech.

What if donating to charitable causes meant exposing you and your family to discrimination or retaliation?

When politicians say they want to get rid of “dark money,” they mean they want to get rid of your right to privately donate to organizations that speak out about their actions and agendas.

Over 100 million Americans now benefit from laws that block officials from prying your personal information out of the nonprofits you support.

"At a time when Americans are waking up to threats to their liberty, I am excited to join an organization that is standing strong for privacy and free speech," said Santorum.

Want all the latest updates on donor privacy and free speech in one place? Sign up for our weekly clips:

Every American has a constitutional right to support the causes in which they believe. To protect that right, we need to respect donor privacy.