7/ Read the full evaluation report here:

6/ Overall takeaway: a strong conceptual appetite paired with concrete, addressable opportunities to improve usability, equity, and legitimacy in future iterations.

5/ We also surfaced clear gaps: onboarding and design challenges around propagation mechanics, scoring, and how trust translates into decisions.

4/ Engagement mattered. Participants who actively exchanged attestations were significantly more likely to view the system as fair, efficient, and legitimate.

3/ Even with uneven participation, early network activity produced meaningful peer validation signals — suggesting the model can surface trust in practice, not just theory.

2/ Big signal: there’s consistent interest in trust-based governance as a missing primitive in today’s systems — plus strong demand for real-world application guidance, especially for grassroots organizing, mutual aid networks, and DAOs.

1/ We’ve shared an evaluation of the first live TrustGraph prototype — focused on early proof points for trust-based attestation governance. Read in full here: https://t.co/ijVFLzFkV6 🧵⬇️

trust is the fundamental social primitive @TrustGraphNet operationalizes this primitive as a modular component for higher level socio-technical infrastructure the future is trust-based

@TrustGraphNet is what happens when you realize there's no credibly neutral way to select domain experts to allocate eth localist public goods funding & u nerd snipe the greatest minds in DAOs to build it. next gen DAO tooling made possible by WAVS, verified offchain compute