Tom Plesier
@TomPlesier
Followers
407
Following
4K
Media
2K
Statuses
23K
Does something with radiative forcing.
Joined December 2019
0
0
0
Every day, Trump seems to amaze me on how stupid a single individual that has been given power, can be.
0
0
1
Exacly. Running or walking infront of a car, is a threat.
I don’t know who needs to hear this, but it literally doesn’t matter which way your wheels are turned when you run into someone. Courts don’t decide intent based on tire angle. A moving vehicle near a person is a threat, period.
0
0
0
This is not self defence, this is murder. The murderer, an incompetent agent.
Wow
0
0
1
Do Trump supporters realise the only reason for Trump to claim Greenland is bc of the Human induced global warming? Greenland becomes a strategic place once the ice sheets melt. Irony wasted on the stupid. #Greenland #Trump
0
0
0
That is exacly why they did it for! Preserve our freedom.
0
0
0
This is a note from the 1939 translation. The original 1921 edition in german uses the term "Auslander", it can be translated as foreigner, however, earlier in the book he clearly discribes foreigners as aliens.
1
1
1
Mein Kampf: Part 2 Chapter 3. President Trump thinks and acts like a NAZI!
1
1
2
If the USA is a beacon of freedom. Where free speech is the standard. Why did Kirk get kiled? Why did Kimmel get fired? Why do citizens get fired for expressing their opinion? Nahh, the USA is a tyranny.
0
1
1
USA, its a war economy. There needs to he a war where they can mingle or else their economy might crash. Downside of spending a high % of GDP on defence and arms. Guess why Trump likes to use the army against his own citizens? 😉
0
1
1
Waarop een @playsports abbo aanschaffen als TipiK het gewoon gratis uitzend... zelfde land, andere taal. Maar hey, laat die meertaligheid z'n werk doen. 😄 #F1
1
1
2
Men vraagt hier duidelijk om de breuk op te lossen en de correcte tussenstappen te nemen. 2 x 3 wolken kan niet want 3 is niet gelijk aan 1/5de deel van 10. QED. Juf is correct.
Mijn dochter krijgt hier puntenaftrek omdat ze 2x3 schrijft ipv 3x2... Kan er iemand wiskundig onderbouwen waarom - uit de vraagstelling blijkt dat - het 3x2 moet zijn? Wat denken we hiervan @FionaFeagle ?
2
1
1
Its a thing I see unfolding on social media. For example when it comes to climate change. There are one-liners, falacious arguments, mocking with science as in saying its a big scam. Those are the guys "winning" the debate. They rest on emotionial bias, not the truth. 2/2
0
0
2
Plato hated debate. Because in debate you'll argue with fallacies just to make a win. For the witnesses of the debate that would be confusing, its hard to separate the truth and we would easily believe the winner of the debate tells the truth. 1/2
1
1
1
Looking for a nutjob that claims "CO2 is plant food". That can explain why my plants are dying in a 1000-1200ppm environment if I don't water them for a few weeks. GL.
0
1
2
Hah, je zou ze moeten bezig zien als het om klimaatverandering gaat. Iedereen geofysicus. 🫣
Ongelooflijk hoeveel mensen hier debiele takes verspreiden over de drones. Kennis hebben over een onderwerp waar je iets over zegt is op dit platform blijkbaar echt niet meer belangrijk voor velen. Jammere zaak voor de maatschappij.
0
1
2