@ThinkingPowers
Thinking Is Power
1 year
This argument is basically: The consensus doesn’t support what I want to believe, so scientists haven’t considered my position. It fails to understand how science works. Scientists question science ALL the time, so what’s more likely is: I don’t know what scientists know.
Tweet media one
18
33
148

Replies

@jonathanstea
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
1 year
@jonathanstea
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
1 year
It’s important to not confuse legitimate scientific inquiry with JAQing off (“just asking questions”).
Tweet media one
6
29
151
1
3
24
@ThinkingPowers
Thinking Is Power
1 year
0
0
6
@RuthW1940
Ruth Walker
1 year
@ThinkingPowers @jonathanstea @CaulfieldTim @TheSGEM @DrAndyNo @johnfocook @CIRCE_team There is nothing a physicist would like better than to prove Einstein wrong (paraphrased from Discover Magazine middle 1990s, if I recall correctly.)
1
0
4
@ThinkingPowers
Thinking Is Power
1 year
0
0
2
@banaifeldstein
Banai Lynn Feldstein
1 year
@ThinkingPowers @jonathanstea @CaulfieldTim @TheSGEM @DrAndyNo @johnfocook @CIRCE_team He thinks that opinions should be on par with actual science. There is no such thing as "reasoned" questioning of science by the people who are tweeting their opinions that covid is fake, masks do nothing, etc.
1
0
3
@ThinkingPowers
Thinking Is Power
1 year
0
0
1
@bill_c10
Steven Guilbeault Minister of Environment PARODY
1 year
0
0
0
@jonathanstea
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
1 year
@ThinkingPowers @CaulfieldTim @TheSGEM @DrAndyNo @johnfocook @CIRCE_team Musk has also revealed himself to be an unapologetic bigot.
Tweet media one
0
3
20
@ThinkingPowers
Thinking Is Power
1 year
@drhilljack @jonathanstea @CaulfieldTim @TheSGEM @DrAndyNo @johnfocook @CIRCE_team Whether he agrees with me or no is irrelevant. And scientists are human, and can be influenced. But science doesn’t rely on individuals. Musk has openly stated anti-science views & is parroting a talking point deniers commonly use to justify what they want to believe.
0
2
16
@akildasan
Akil Dasan
1 year
@ThinkingPowers @jonathanstea @CaulfieldTim @TheSGEM @DrAndyNo @johnfocook @CIRCE_team Doesn’t the scientific critical attitude call us to reject uncritical deference to authorities/consensus/emotions and hostility toward questions? Consensus-based science sounds like lysenkoism. Logical explanations, debate & moral engagement demonstrate expertise in my view.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
Tweet media four
2
0
0
@bfs465
Dr Lou 🌻
1 year
@ThinkingPowers @CaulfieldTim @jonathanstea @TheSGEM @DrAndyNo @johnfocook @CIRCE_team And science doesn't change no matter one's personal opinion or political agenda. That it's 'my opinion' or 'we'll have to agree to disagree' is inadequate since an opinion still needs to be framed by a fact-based argument or perspective
0
0
1
@docpgb
peter brindley
1 year
0
0
3