StatModeling Profile Banner
Andrew Gelman et al. Profile
Andrew Gelman et al.

@StatModeling

Followers
48K
Following
3
Media
0
Statuses
9K

Automatically tweets new posts from https://t.co/A8uFi473gj Please respond in the comment section of the blog. Old posts spool at https://t.co/HLEEe8oMCd

Joined November 2010
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
16 hours
If you’re interested in the Box-Cox power transformation . . . https://t.co/Xhlmovppwq
0
0
1
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
1 day
Seven-parameter drift-diffusion pdfs and cdfs now in Stan https://t.co/ugRTejVPY9
0
2
2
@MichaelWhiwal
Michael White
2 days
Hosted a broker tour focusing on “water-positive” homes with rainwater harvesting and greywater systems. In the desert, water security is the new luxury amenity.
0
0
0
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
1 day
A slew of improvements to NUTS https://t.co/v8ed3FQr9I
0
4
11
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
2 days
“We conclude that apparent effects of growth mindset interventions on academic achievement are likely attributable to inadequate study design, reporting flaws, and bias.” https://t.co/QnWGc9pLsv
6
31
212
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
2 days
StanCon 2026 registration and abstract submission are now open https://t.co/sIp3idBZQD
0
0
0
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
3 days
25,000 lives saved per ship sunk, $100,000 per citation, a probability of 10^-90 of a decisive vote . . . Is there a through line from B.S. numbers in junk science to B.S. numbers coming from the government? https://t.co/Gx2C9cm3f2
0
2
12
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
3 days
Survey Statistics: divine probabilities https://t.co/n1Ljv5l6wm
0
0
3
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
4 days
“it has been argued that current chatbots may pose a risk of amplifying delusional thinking in vulnerable users, due to their tendency to sycophantic and overly validating behaviour” https://t.co/RWi8CkPMhq
0
1
11
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
4 days
More on school reform, this time New Orleans https://t.co/JjVU3PF7MH
0
1
4
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
5 days
My new class this spring: POLS 4280, Rationalizing the World: The Hopes and Disappointments of American Social Science from 1900 to the Present https://t.co/2M49ZWeQTH
1
5
46
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
6 days
The life of the artist “is a constant–and constantly losing–battle to keep at bay...the permanent shortfall of physical and mental abilities in the context of the perfection that art strives to be, and...the inevitable arrival of silence and death.” https://t.co/HoSL54oBaB
0
0
5
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
6 days
This guy hates sociology. https://t.co/pnxnBua6BR
0
0
3
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
7 days
An idea for getting approximately calibrated 50% subjective probability ranges https://t.co/zBODXeaOBP
0
0
4
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
8 days
The Sapolsky Sanction https://t.co/DVMGXkb2de
1
1
11
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
8 days
When the numbers don’t look right, check them! (Mississippi education update) https://t.co/rYzixNHXDN
1
2
20
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
9 days
From Bayesian inference to LLMs (Steve Bronder’s 2025 CppCon talk) https://t.co/eg7xEP7wZp
0
0
4
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
10 days
Gerd Gigerenzer on the legacy of Daniel Kahneman https://t.co/ica432AqUg
0
5
22
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
10 days
Survey Statistics: probability samples vs epsem samples vs SRS samples https://t.co/iBc52ogCu4
0
2
3
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
11 days
Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein in a remake of The Big Clock https://t.co/OBlemID6Vi
0
1
3
@StatModeling
Andrew Gelman et al.
11 days
Effective sample size depends on the quantity https://t.co/3Hk2TyWydM
0
1
13