Starkscan - Starknet Block Explorer
@StarkscanCo
Followers
3K
Following
741
Media
142
Statuses
441
Next-generation @Starknet Block Explorer
Starknet
Joined August 2022
Why don't you show the timestamps? The reason ur service went down was bc u reached the quota. We added 300k (3x your current tier) of free quota to support u. We added it within 3 minutes yesterday. At $49, u are not obligated to any support. U get what u pay for
it's been 24h waiting to get in touch with starkscan... Do those guys know what production-ready means, SLA, etc.
0
20
2
Staking dashboard is now available on Starkscan! https://t.co/cnAQPzZDBC
STRK staking phase 1 is now live on Mainnet! This marks a major milestone, as Starknet is officially the first L2 to introduce staking directly on its layer. The ultimate goal is to transform it into a fully decentralized PoS network over time, entirely owned and secured by the
6
70
48
1
67
9
Hola hola STARKnianos Solo pasaba a desearles felices fiestas 🎄🧑🏻🎄 Recordar que la 0.13 llegará a mainnet en Enero, reduciéndo costos💸, pagos en #STRK... Vimos 64 uops el 19-12-23. Mucho más que medidas tps, podemos revisar el TW de @bkiepuszewski
https://t.co/Fl2p4JGZ7P
TPS is a very faulty metric to measure blockchain throughput. And it's going to get worse in the future. One of the potential alternatives is to measure UOPS - User Ops per second. But what are they, how they relate to AA and is it really a feasible alternative ? 🧵👇
6
65
27
not bad, 0.13 is in 3 weeks on mainnet and will kick ass. more UOPS daddy 👉👈
18
74
179
feature is live 🤩
Dear @StarkscanCo team, Could you please add comma to "Balance" column for user easy reading and add a new "Percentage" column like my screenshot, please? Hope the best!
8
64
47
Starkscan now supports sepolia! https://t.co/QrMnDNWAex
2
63
22
It’s easier than before to start migrating to Sepolia, as explorers like @StarkscanCo and API providers like @NethermindStark and @BlastAPI now offer Sepolia support. Starknet will be migrating its testnet to Sepolia following the deprecation of Goerli. Goerli testnet will be
43
112
434
TPS measures Transaction Per Second, but is there a more accurate way of measuring blockchain throughput? Enter UOPS. No, it’s not an accident. It’s User Operations Per Second. On Starknet, transactions are processed as MultiCalls aka ‘bundles’ (shoutout to AA). So,
47
225
433
@EliBenSasson UserOperation per second is more suitable for measuring the performance of Starknet than TPS Starknet’s uniqueness will redefine L2’s status system Just as what @StarkscanCo do https://t.co/4Hd16KDDie
Starkscan strongly supports @bkiepuszewski initiative to measure UOPS. At @StarkscanCo , we have been calling it MCPS (Main Calls Per Second). In light of this thread below, we have renamed our graph to UOPS. Introducing the UOPS graph on @Starknet!
1
64
17
Blockchains are being conceptually definancialized - finally! Next up: ”wallet” -> ”browser”
Starkscan strongly supports @bkiepuszewski initiative to measure UOPS. At @StarkscanCo , we have been calling it MCPS (Main Calls Per Second). In light of this thread below, we have renamed our graph to UOPS. Introducing the UOPS graph on @Starknet!
0
69
19
icymi: MCPS renamed to UOPS based on recent developments.
To compare Starknet's performance to TPS of other L2, MCPS is the most accurate ratio currently available. Multicall allows multiple operations such as 'approve' and 'swap' to seamlessly intertwine in a single transaction, boosting Starknet's efficiency and
1
60
41
that is starkscan 👍👍👍
Starkscan strongly supports @bkiepuszewski initiative to measure UOPS. At @StarkscanCo , we have been calling it MCPS (Main Calls Per Second). In light of this thread below, we have renamed our graph to UOPS. Introducing the UOPS graph on @Starknet!
0
85
14
done
I'd love to see this implemented.
1
54
16