Our book Brexit and Citizens' Rights is now out. We discuss Brexit and its impact on the rights of different groups of citizens: British, EU27, third country nationals, in the UK and in the EU.

RT @roberta_perna: If you do research on #migration & #ethnicity, send a #panel/#paper proposal to our S30 'International Migration: Polici….

Another article in the upcoming special issue of Social Policy and Administration edited by @EmilienFargues and I: @SophieAndreetta analyses how courts in Belgium interpret and implement welfare policies for migrants on an everyday basis

RT @GlobalCIT_EUI: New #Citizenship Literature! 🌍📚. This week's GLOBALCIT pick: 📘 Statelessness in Public Law by Dorota Pudzianowska. A fo….

RT @Infantinofed: I talked to @TheEconomist of the advantageous effects of the outsourcing of visa processing, most notably getting rid of….

- Britons in the EU beyond the limited number of countries studied until now.- The impact of Brexit on third-country nationals.

@BridgetByrne3 These include:.- the co-presence of citizens with settled status and other legacy statuses and co-citizens who are subject to the visa system.- the migratory flows since the end of the transition period, in particular for onward migrants.

In the conclusions to the book, @BridgetByrne3 and I put in relation the Brexit process with the later developments in migratory flows and migration policies in the UK and EU. We further highlight some necessary lines of future research around Brexit.

She discuss in particular how racialised, colonial and gendered aspects of migration intersect with the concept of family, as well as the implications of looking into citizenship by ancestry in the Brexit context.

In her chapter, @uncomfy looks back at the Referendum campaigns, and at the use of the 'European family' on the Remain side. She discusses how this concept relates to the wider intersections of migration and family.

He shows the political polarisation within the group between Brexiters and Remainers, and how Remainers in particular built new political skills to mobilise against Brexit.

Using ethnographic research with Britons in Spain, Jeremy MacClancy explores how the group, mostly studied in literature as lifestyle migrants, reacted politically to Brexit.

RT @SScuzzarello: This is going to be a great way to close the term. Erica has been a visiting fellow at the SCMR and her work is truly fas….

I show how fears about the loss of formal rights - which could be contrasted by naturalising - coexisted, especially in the UK, with fears about the rise of xenophobia and about economic crises, against which naturalisation could not protect.

In my own chapter in the book I use interviews with British and EU citizens in the UK and Belgium to discuss how they managed the fears deriving from the loss of rights and from the long and uncertain negotiation between the UK and the EU

She shows how interviewees hoped to access right and protection through naturalisation, but also felt that being recognised as British was out of reach because of their biography, accent and other expectations.

Using interviews with EU27 candidate to British citizenship, Marianela Barrios Aquino locates Brexit within the wider process of restriction of British citizenship which included the introduction of integration requirements

She shows in particular how the women were in tension between deteriorating relations in the UK, in some cases a political disidentification with Poland, and the possibility of finding conviviality at the level of multicultural neighbourhoods.

Starting from ethnographic research in Manchester with Polish women migrants conducted before and after the Brexit Referendum, @alinaewa shows how the Brexit process has changed the belonging, citizenship and conviviality of the group.

RT @CGMoreh: This looks amazing! And it's #OpenAccess!.

He shows in particular how much of British legislation on behaviour-based denaturalisation seems to have been drafted to deal with specific individual rather than with general norms.