It pains us to say this, but the founder of Sci-Hub has suddenly removed the $SciHub token contract from the official site and announced she no longer supports the token. What began when Alex accepted donations, listed the CA, and encouraged people to fund Sci-Hub by buying the

Proud to see our incubated project @SCAI_Agents launch their token! 🚀 . Congrats to the team on this big milestone.

What do you want to know?.

The start:. The end:.

Huge news — our decentralized paper storage platform SciBox has just surpassed 100,000 papers! 📚✨. This milestone wouldn’t be possible without @irys_xyz powering the permanent data layer. Meanwhile, SCAI(@SCAI_Agents) is gaining momentum with 16,000+ unique active users on our

FAQ 中文版本.

Final words:. Most conflicts stem from differing perspectives. The $SciHub community endured many of them — and grew stronger because of it. Let’s move forward. $SciHub was born from DeSci, as a meme coin to support Sci-Hub. While we will no longer support Sci-Hub or this.

6. Why did the $SciHub community build its own products?. As a meme coin community, we shared a goal: increasing market cap. Basic tasks like social media, shilling, marketing, collaborations, and web maintenance were handled by community contributors. Many contributors also.

5. Does buying $SciHub mean your money was purely a donation to Sci-Hub?. No. As one of the most successful meme coins in the DeSci space, Alex accepted 20% of $SciHub through phased donations. The actual value she received was directly tied to $SciHub’s token price. The more it.

4. Is asking holders to manually swap $SciHub to the new Sci-Hub token a fair solution?. No. In a mature financial system, all rules are designed to protect investor rights. Allowing holders to manually swap introduces extreme inequality in trading outcomes — timing becomes.

3. Did Sci-Hub’s new token impact $SciHub holders?. Yes, significantly. Most $SciHub holders bought the token because its contract address (CA) was listed on the official Sci-Hub website. Without that, $SciHub likely would’ve gone to zero like many failed celebrity or.

2. Can $SciHub continue after Sci-Hub launched a new token?. No — for two reasons. First, the original purpose of $SciHub as a donation meme coin was to support Sci-Hub through trading. Compared to direct donation, this approach brought in more participants and funding. Now that.

1. Was $SciHub already “dead” before Sci-Hub launched its own official token?. No. $SciHub is a meme project in the DeSci space. It launched its token at the peak of DeSci’s popularity late last year. As DeSci interest faded, all related projects declined, yet $SciHub’s market.

FAQ:. 1. Was $SciHub already “dead” before Sci-Hub launched its own official token?. 2. Can $SciHub continue after Sci-Hub launched a new token?. 3. Did Sci-Hub’s new token impact $SciHub holders?. 4. Is asking holders to manually swap $SciHub to the new Sci-Hub token a fair.

[$SciHub Community FAQ thread]. $SciHub was once one of the most successful meme projects in the DeSci donation space. Even at its current bottomed-out market cap, it still ranks in the Top DeSci Meme Coin list. As stated in our trading risk warning before, the $SciHub story has

SCIHUB = Free Knowledge

RT @KingmenHuang: 这是我们坚持建设 @SciHubFans @SCAI_Agents 的动力💪.#SciHub #SCAICH

RT @SciHubFans: How soon is soon?. Sci-Net mutual paper-exchange network is now available for testing!. Help other members to get access to….

RT @destinylin1113: @TingHu888 社群雖然離開不少人，但剩下的依然在建設。社群開發的 使用人數穩定成長。. 現在 #Scihub 創始人的論文互助平台已經上線，加入的人必須持有至少1000 $scihu….

RT @mofasasi: Way to go! 💪