Get context on all your transactions on supported chains/networks. An example with @XPRNetwork All transactions fetched for all transaction types. Prices labeled for all transactions from the day/time of the TRX. Helps for better understanding of where your money is going

with the lending rates spiking for @MetalDollarXMD on the @LOAN_Protocol I want to showcase some functionality of our AI. This is what happens inside of Scales when using the Webauth Wallet. Detects the best asset to borrow/lend. Transactions function in app. Live rates. Full

The takeaway Each protocol represents a different stage in DeFi’s maturity. Aave defines resilience, Morpho redefines optimization, and Loan builds accessibility and compliance. $AAVE Use when you want stability, liquidity depth, and a proven track record. $LOAN Use when you

$Morpho Architected for optimization. Morpho enhances capital efficiency by matching lenders and borrowers directly, reducing reliance on liquidity pools. It sits between Aave’s depth and the Loan Protocol's agility by offering improved rates through peer-matching and protocol

$LOAN Built for efficiency and clarity. Designed to simplify yield generation for both individuals and institutions through structured scoring and automation. While it lacks Aave’s liquidity depth, it’s emerging quickly with a focus on compliance alignment and risk transparency

$AAVE The established blue chip of DeFi lending. Deep liquidity, battle-tested governance, and proven resilience across market cycles. Its strength lies in decentralization and organic borrower demand, not yield emissions. Aave remains the benchmark for transparency, audit

Yield on DeFi lending platforms are not created equal. Today we analyzed @aave, @LOAN_Protocol, and @MorphoLabs. Aave vs Loan Protocol vs Morpho. 👇

5. The takeaway Aave remains one of DeFi’s strongest players. But yield alone isn’t the signal, context is. Scales turns fragmented on-chain data into risk-adjusted intelligence. Showing not just where yield comes from, but how safe it is.

4. Why risk-adjusted yield matters Two protocols can both show 5% APY yet one could collapse under volatility, the other compounds sustainably. Knowing that difference separates speculation from strategy.

3. What the numbers don’t show Even Aave carries risk. Audits don’t eliminate risk, they quantify it. When markets move, collateral factors, liquidity health, and oracle stability all define how yield behaves.

2. Real vs. inflated yield Aave’s returns come from borrower demand, not token emissions. That makes it one of the few protocols producing organic, fee-based yield rather than inflationary rewards.

1. The illusion of “consistent yield” Aave’s APY looks stable. Usually 2–6% on BTC or ETH. But those numbers hide liquidity depth, cross-chain dependencies, and security exposure. At Scales, we measure yield per unit of risk, not just the % return.

Most DeFi yield isn’t real yield. Here’s how we think about risk-adjusted yield, using @Aave as an example 👇

We are building this live. Hit the follow to watch the intelligence layer for Decentralized Finance unfold.

Introducing Scales We’re building the intelligence layer of decentralized finance. Scales is an AI-driven, non-custodial platform that helps you make sense of DeFi by: - Benchmarking on-chain yields (the S&P 500 of DeFi yield) - Scoring protocols by risk, compliance, and