3-tier approach that help you maintain integrity when using AI for research ⤵️ (Retweet 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘦 𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘈𝘐 𝘶𝘴𝘦) — TIER 1 (Safe): Grammar checks, readability improvements, language translation — TIER 2 (Careful): Outlining from YOUR content, summarizing

Get free credits to try the tool here:

Search, Analyze, Visualize -> all within ONE platform! 🔗 Head to the link in thread (to get free credits) And let it ⤵️ — Search across research papers: You ask a question. It pulls relevant findings from multiple studies at once. — Identify research gaps: Shows you what's

🔗 Read the article here: https://t.co/aCG92tIsIs

Do presentations make you nervous? You're not alone! The tips and tricks in this article are gold! (Retweet and Save with 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘦.𝘮𝘦) - Keep it simple: 3 key points max. Don't overload. - Practice, practice, practice: Time yourself. - Use visuals wisely: 1 slide per

I asked my colleague for feedback on a paper. "𝘊𝘢𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘴𝘬 𝘈𝘐 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘐 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴?" they said! Smart people are choosing convenience over curiosity. ..saying AI can be curious for them. But it's important to know: When you stop writing, you

📌 Want help choosing the best AI tools (and LLMs) for your #research? Get my 7-hour course (20+ chapters) + bonuses 🔗

We're about to create the 1st gen of scientists who can't research without AI. And honestly? I'm not sure if that's evolution or devolution! 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘁𝗚𝗣𝗧 𝘁𝗼: — Extract key findings from dense papers in seconds — Design entire

Research gaps aren’t just 'missing studies' They can be theoretical, methodological, practical etc.. & knowing which type you’re addressing defines the value of your work. Answerthis makes this process structured, not accidental. & tools that systematize this don’t replace

Try research gap finder here: 🔗

Research gaps aren’t just 'missing studies' They can be theoretical, methodological, practical etc.. & knowing which type you’re addressing defines the value of your work. Answerthis makes this process structured, not accidental. & tools that systematize this don’t replace

📌 Want help choosing the best AI tools (and LLMs) for your #research? Get my 7-hour course (20+ chapters) + bonuses 🔗

Want FREE tips on using AI in research? ↳ Join 11K+ researchers here ⬇️ 🔗

Here are my recommended tools with discount codes: 🔗

📌 Are you struggling to choose the best AI tool (& LLMs) for your #research? Get my 7-hour course (20+ chapters) + bonuses where I break this process to make it easier for you to select the right tool for the right use case. (do check what others are saying about this course)

From panelist in 2024 to leading a session in 2025. Thanks TJU for inviting me back to speak to Post-Professional OT Doctorate researchers. 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞'𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐝 ⤵️ The biggest barrier isn't learning new tools. It's trusting they'll actually save time

Useful find? Pass it on! 🔄 Retweet 👋 I’m @RaziaAliani Click my name + follow + 🔔 I post about AI in #research & #analysis Want FREE tips on using AI in research? ↳ Join 15K+ researchers: 🔗

Here's the link to get 40% off for the next 5 days 🔗 https://t.co/d5Wxg7mjoY

Finding a research gap is a slow & uncertain process. Liner shows you EXACTLY what’s worth investigating. This solves the biggest nightmare of most researchers! It generates hypotheses, critiques them, & guides refinement, here's how ⤵️ — Start with a broad question. — Liner

Read your conclusion first. Then your intro. If they don't match, one of them is wrong. Here's how to do it ⤵️ Step 1: Write a rough conclusion based on your findings Step 2: Read it back to yourself out loud Step 3: Draft your intro to match what you actually discovered Step

Most researchers freeze when it’s time to write discussion They either repeat results or ramble without focus. Here's my 3-paragraph approach that actually works ⤵️ 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵 1: What did I actually find? Not what I hoped to find. What the data shows. Ask yourself: If