The lack of transparency around voting machines should be a national scandal.

Great news keeps coming for election integrity! SCOTUS ruled 7-2 in Bost v. Illinois (Jan 14): Candidates have standing to challenge vote-counting rules BEFORE elections. No more dodging on standing or mootness after minor tweaks.Our @AmistadProject 2020 study of 400+ cases

We’re building machines that reflect our image — efficient, powerful, and spiritually hollow. The crisis isn’t technological. It’s moral. My new Epoch Times column:

A deterministic machine cannot forgive, repent, or reconcile. When a culture forgets how to learn morally, its machines won’t save it — they’ll merely scale the crisis. More in my new column:

Legacy media claims courts "debunked" 2020 election concerns. Wrong! As Director of @AmistadProject, our study of 400+ lawsuits shows: Conservative/Republican litigants prevailed on the merits 43% of the time—higher than Democrats/progressives at 31%.Many cases lost on procedural

We own the warehouse, so you get 5000+ groceries & essentials cheaper & faster. Use code WELCOME for 50% off your first order.

Nope, central VA.

SCOTUS hits the nail on the head: Candidates have a "concrete and particularized interest in the rules that govern the counting of votes in their elections... Their interest extends to the integrity of the election—and the democratic process." (Majority opinion) This echoes what

In 2020, we challenged illegal changes to election laws, but courts often dismissed on standing or mootness after minor tweaks by officials. This delayed merits review until AFTER elections, especially in protracted counting periods. Bost changes that—candidates like Rep. Mike

Great news from SCOTUS in Bost v. Illinois! Candidates now have clear standing to challenge unlawful election rules BEFORE votes are counted. This limits procedural dodges that delay justice. As Director of The Amistad Project, I saw this firsthand in 2020—left-leaning officials

Earn unlimited cash back on your trades when you open a Lightspeed account!

Poll Question: When a culture places its hope in government rather than God, it eventually accepts government control over speech and conscience. Agree? Yes — history proves it No — government should protect us from emotionally harmful speech #RuleOfLaw #FreeSpeech

Big question coming next. What happens to liberty when a culture places its hope in government instead of God?

When fear drives us to government for salvation, we trade liberty for security — and eventually lose both. The American experiment was built on the opposite premise: trust in God and self‑government. That’s the exceptionalism we must reclaim. #AmericanExceptionalism #Liberty

This is the cultural root of our free‑speech debates. A society that worships government will inevitably accept government‑approved speech. A society that worships God insists that truth is not defined by the state. #FreeSpeech

Claim Your Free 20 AI Second Act Stocks + Newsletter Now

For decades, political leaders and media have nurtured the belief that government can solve every problem. That message reshapes the soul. A people who once trusted God and community now instinctively turn to the state for rescue. #RuleOfLaw

On Beyond the Beltway this morning, we dug into a deeper issue: the erosion of individual liberty as our culture is taught to look to government — not God — for hope, security, and meaning. What you turn to when fearful is what you worship. #AmericanExceptionalism

Iran shows the end‑stage of state‑controlled speech. Europe’s “harm” and “offense” laws follow the same logic: government decides what may be said. The U.S. must resist this drift. Free people confront lies with truth, not criminal penalties. #FreeSpeech #AmericanExceptionalism

Many don’t realize this: the U.S. First Amendment is unique — a constitutional barrier against government control of speech. Elsewhere — Britain, Canada, Australia — “hate speech” laws make expression conditional, controlled by statute rather than a constitution. Iran’s

Most people don’t realize this: the U.S. First Amendment is unique in the world — a constitutional barrier against government control of speech. Elsewhere, “hate speech” laws make expression a privilege granted by the state. Iran’s executions for dissent show the stakes. Free

This Soros-linked NGO funding behind anti-ICE training & division echoes the corruption I've exposed for years: oversized government enabling elite control via misused nonprofits, often at taxpayer expense. See my 2022 column "The United States Is a Corrupt Nation":

As we approach America's 250th, demanding facts over frenzy preserves justice & unity—core to our exceptional calling of virtue and freedom. Read the full analysis in my latest column: https://t.co/mGJRHZN1DK Share if you stand for truth. Follow for more. #AmericanExceptionalism