@OneTrueKirk @MakerDAO Our approach was working with crypto card companies like @wirexapp and . There were options to have whitelisted cards and make it "Dai" card but working with existing ones were better. And to be honest, it still is better than operating our own

@DooWanNam @MakerDAO @wirexapp Using some existing service providers in the stack makes sense, but having more direct involvement in the branding and operation is valuable There’s a good reason so many companies issue their own branded cards. For example, a Maker card could offer reduced fees when your…

@OneTrueKirk @MakerDAO Monolith exists since years though and I don’t think there is a huge interest in it

@0xGeeGee @MakerDAO Had never heard of this before, looks like there are some issues with it: 1. Website says “Please note that new card applications are unavailable” 2. Not branded/marketed by Maker 3. Passes on L1 gas fees to the user 4. High fees on top of this (1% fee just to top it off with…

@OneTrueKirk @MakerDAO Gnosis chain is the former xDAI chain whose only point was to use DAI for gas fees. You could kind of say Gnosis Pay is a card for MakerDAO.

@moo9000 @MakerDAO True, but this partnership could have been pursued much more strongly, with Maker putting its brand directly behind a card and mobile app

@OneTrueKirk @MakerDAO Spin outs and subDAOs was always the way to go. Some were just too early.

@OneTrueKirk @MakerDAO This could be an awesome Subdao

@OneTrueKirk @MakerDAO What DAI also desperately needs in a partnership like circle has with CB for free offramping.

@OneTrueKirk @MakerDAO Come to Dappcon in May !

@OneTrueKirk @MakerDAO Come to @dappcon_berlin in May!

@OneTrueKirk @MakerDAO @MakerDAO vs @gnosispay vs @ether