No, it is not the purpose of government to help people, that is stealing one person's money to give to another, and that is not ethical.

The following 7 points are falsehoods.

I've listened to Marxists say that wealth is a finite quantity because labor is a finite quantity, a person can only work so many hours a week. This ignores the industrial revolution. Technology increases the productivity of labor. Without technology we would all be living in

Being a stakeholder in a business does not give a person the right to decide how a business is run. Only the owners (investors) have that right. "Stakeholder Capitalism" is not capitalism at all, it is socialism in disguise.

I had to sponsor the immigration of my first wife, promising she would never receive public assistance. This is the law. Not only were illegal immigrants violating the law, so were public officials who refused to enforce sponsorship.

Why to people hate America? Because they believe they are not receiving the things they think they are entitled to.

When a poor man robs a middle-class man, the middle-class man is still richer than the robber. The injustice is the theft, not the inequality. There is equal justice, but there is no such thing a just equality.

To devalue the currency is to devalue the wealth that all people have accumulated. How can the wealth of a nation grow when the currency is inflated?

Private labor results in wage-slave labor when the worker is payed for his labor but not allowed to retain his property. What political-economic action does not permit a person to retain the value of his labor?

“There are a dozen views about everything until you know the answer. Then there's never more than one.” — C.S. Lewis

Rome fell because it's economy collapsed, military defeats happened because the economy collapsed. What was the cause? https://t.co/dNtNBj0Xrh

If you think what government does is stupid, you're correct. Can you answer the questions below?

There is a logical flaw that most people do not see regarding socialism. The purpose of the social (state) ownership of the means of production is to be able to control it. But control does not require ownership, control is done by regulation. Hitler and Mussolini knew this.

Would not 2% inflation mean a 2% reduction in economic growth? Yet industrial societies celebrate 2% growth. It seems logical that if the currency was stable they would get a 4% growth.

When a poor man robs a middle-class man, the middle-class man is still richer than the robber. The injustice is the theft, not the inequality. There is equal justice, but there is no such thing a just equality.

The rich get richer, but everybody else gets richer still.

I've read many a post decrying slavery, which is extinct in the United States and Europe. Yet at the same time these "critics" see nothing wrong with an income tax. The hypocrisy is blatant.

To devalue the currency is to devalue the wealth that all people have accumulated. How can the wealth of a nation grow when the currency is inflated?

Here's the thing about "law and order" conservatism. It's a good principle, it helps society be stable and function. You need laws, and laws must be enforced. But it makes you a hostage to wicked people who put their wicked schemes into the law, and now you must obey them.