“Dispelling the Myth, propagated by Abu Mazen’s wing of Fatah and liberal zionists, that Israel Funded Hamas: A Thread” This is an old Fatah lie, anchored in, during the Israeli occupation of Gaza, Israel permitting Sheikh Yassin’s Islamic Society to open in 1967 and then the

administration for Gaza. […]”

resolution, which Reuters also reviewed, requests the Secretary-General of the United Nations to determine the options for deploying an international stabilization force in Gaza, and it does not mention the ‘Peace Council’ that the United States proposed as a transitional

its own draft resolution in the United Nations regarding Gaza, challenging the United States’ attempt to pass its own text in the Security Council—one that would endorse Donald Trump’s plan for Gaza—according to a copy of the draft reviewed by Reuters. The Russian draft

the plan provides ‘an achievable pathway toward peace and stability’—not only between Palestinians and Israelis, but for the region as a whole. The statement concluded with an anticipation of the resolution’s speedy adoption in the Security Council. Russia proposed on Thursday

Nations—pointed out that the states that signed it are the same states that met during the week to launch this process, which constitutes a pathway toward Palestinian self-determination and statehood. The states stressed that the initiative represents ‘a sincere effort,’ and that

t explained that the resolution supports the historic comprehensive plan for ending the conflict in Gaza that was announced on September 29, and that ‘won support and acclaim during the Sharm el-Sheikh meeting.’ The statement—published by Washington’s mission to the United

Pakistan, Jordan, and Turkey issued a joint statement announcing their support for the Security Council resolution currently under discussion, which was drafted by the United States after consultations and cooperation with Council members and partners in the region. The statemen

free people of the world, to stand against this resolution, reject any form of guardianship or foreign intervention, and defend Gaza’s right to freedom, dignity, and independence.’ On Friday, the United States, Qatar, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia,

Strip under various titles ‘that practically represent a new attempt to impose another form of occupation on our land and our people, and to legitimize foreign guardianship over the future of our national cause.’ The factions called on ‘all Arab and Islamic states, and all the

resistance, but the Palestinian cause in its entirety.’ [...] Yesterday, Palestinian factions said they are following the ongoing efforts inside the corridors of the United Nations to pass the American draft resolution concerning the deployment of international forces in the Gaza

Authority by some states so that a national agreement with Hamas is not reached.’ Kilani concludes his remarks by emphasizing that the coming stage will be extremely sensitive for the Palestinian cause, considering that ‘what is targeted in this project is not only the

presence of preconditions from the Authority before reaching any national agreement.’ He adds that the movement participated in earlier meetings in Russia and China in July 2024, ‘but what was reached was not adhered to,’ noting the presence of ‘pressures exerted on the

presidency welcomed the project—Kilani says that multiple meetings took place between Hamas and the leadership of the Palestinian Authority over the past two years, during which various proposals were presented to end the division, ‘but the obstruction was always due to the

session of the Security Council, and that the Algerian position ‘is open to everything that serves the Palestinian people and the resistance.’ As for the absence of a unified vision in confronting what is being proposed by the United States—especially since the Palestinian

there is occupation, there is resistance,’ citing the fact that Article (51) of the UN Charter guarantees the right of peoples to resist occupation—popularly, militarily, and economically. He points out that the movement communicated with Algeria, which chairs the current

'Ultra Palestine' that ‘what the occupation could not seize in battle, America is trying to seize through an international resolution in whose implementation Arab and Western states participate.’ He affirms that ‘resistance is tied to the existence of occupation, and as long as

absence of any Palestinian participation.’ Regarding the proposed authorization for the international force to use force when necessary to disarm what was described as ‘armed groups,’ Kilani indicates that what is meant by this is ‘Hamas and the resistance factions.’ He tells

believes that the American proposal ‘isolates the Strip and places it under an international umbrella dominated by the United States alongside the Israeli occupation, such that the proposed force serves the occupation’s goals in terms of coordination and administration, in the

He adds that the movement also communicated with ‘friendly states, especially Turkey, Egypt, and Qatar, to place matters in their proper context and clarify the effect of this project on the future of the Palestinian cause and the Palestinian presence in the Gaza Strip.’ He

to, and it does not include the formation of a technocratic committee to administer the Gaza Strip from independent Palestinian figures who possess free will, and it aims at disarmament.’