Melanie Mitchell
@MelMitchell1
Followers
49K
Following
5K
Media
420
Statuses
6K
Professor, Santa Fe Institute. Mostly posting on https://t.co/4NpA2IL5Va (at-melaniemitchell). More thoughts at https://t.co/nC43NHRozX.
Santa Fe, NM
Joined September 2011
!!!
Congratulations to SFI Professor Melanie Mitchell (@MelMitchell1), a winner of the 2025 National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Awards for Excellence in Science Communications (@SciCommAwards). Mitchell is recognized for her writing and podcasting on topics related to AI and
18
20
318
New paper from my group: "Do AI Models Perform Human-like Abstract Reasoning Across Modalities?" ⬇️
11
24
144
A response to the NY Times' Thomas Friedman's "magical thinking" on AI ⬇️
22
51
207
In my latest (and last!) column for Science’s Expert Voices series, I write about the reasons behind AI chatbots’ “deceptive” behaviors (and why Claude threatened a fictional CEO with blackmail). https://t.co/0RglZ9c38a
science.org
A few weeks ago, a colleague of mine needed to collect and format some data from a website, and he asked the latest version of Anthropic’s generative AI system, Claude, for help. Claude cheerfully...
23
72
235
I was interviewed by the journalist Jessica Nordell for her newsletter. We discussed some deep questions related to AI touching on humanities, politics, & dualistic assumptions underlying the conception of "intelligence" in AI. I hope you will read it! ⬇️
5
13
83
New paper: "Large Language Models & Emergence: A Complex Systems Perspective" (D. Krakauer, J. Krakauer, M. Mitchell). We look at claims of "emergent capabilities" & "emergent intelligence" in LLMs from perspective of what emergence means in complexity science. ⬇️
34
143
733
I reviewed "These Strange New Minds: How AI Learned to Talk and What It Means" by Chris Summerfield. ⬇️
6
18
120
Today I learned that the composer David Cope has died. He was the inventor of "Experiments in Musical Intelligence" (EMI), & visionary pioneer in computer-generated music. I wrote about his work in my 2019 book. I posted some excerpts from it in my blog: ⬇️
4
13
96
NSF is now interpreting this as, "Yes, but only as long as the project equally expands participation of overrepresented groups too." (2/3)
2
0
12
A sad/bad day for US Science. By law, Broader Impacts review criteria must include as a goal: "Expanding participation of women and individuals from underrepresented groups in STEM." (1/3)
Today, NSF announced it is terminating awards not aligned with agency priorities, ensuring current & new awards are consistent with our mission. We are committed to creating opportunities for all Americans everywhere, without exclusion of any groups. More: https://t.co/REPzzlI1qG
6
14
68
Vote here: https://t.co/k2ftQXf7Zr (You will need to create an account if you don't have one already.)
1
0
11