Gavin Newsom is lying. This video explains the rest of the story. Texas constitutionally redistricted to fix unconstitutional gerrymandered districts, while California is trying to unconstitutionally gerrymandered congressional districts to alter legal districts. #NoOn50

Today, I was set to race an Ironman in Portugal. But when I learned Gavin Newsom was pushing Prop 50 to destroy our Republic, I canceled my trip to oppose it at the ballot box and in court room. #NoOn50

Am I a polymath? I’m starting to believe. But why define what is? Definition restricts. I just am — and that’s enough for me.

You require a lot less than what I am asking. I am asking every common sense voter in California to also text 50 friends and family members and ask them to return their mail in ballot with a #NoOnProp50 Prop 50 will go down in flames if we simply get out and vote.

Please get this moving Lets all greet King Gavin

Dear No Kings Rally Protesters, You project actions and attitudes onto President Trump, hold rallies, and publicly disparage him, yet worship Gavin Newsom for similar behaviors falsely attributed to Trump. Methinks thou doth protest too much.

11/ So yes, Gavin Newsom and the D.C. machine are gaslighting California Democrats into destroying the one reform they actually love. Don’t fall for it. #NoOn50 #NoOnProp50

10/ National Democrats know that the Congress elected in 2026 will decide if that citizenship question appears. To stop it, they need control of Congress, and Prop 50 is their Trojan horse. This is about special interest power, not California fairness.

9/ They see what’s coming: ⚖️ The Supreme Court could soon end racial gerrymanders (affirmative action for politicians). 📉 2020 census errors gave Democrats ~6 seats, they’ll lose those. 🚚 Voters are fleeing blue states, more seats gone. 📋 A citizenship question in 2030 could

8/ So why the gaslighting? Because national Democrats are panicking. Their radical policies are losing voters. Without gerrymanders, they risk becoming a coastal party of elites with no national base.

7/ Step 3: Pretend the people are deciding. But California is a republic, not a pure democracy. Even majority rule must obey the Constitution. And Prop 50 maps used race as a predominant factor, exactly what the Constitution forbids. A popular vote doesn’t make an illegal map

6/ That means: 💰 Dump millions into Sacramento. 🗺️ Politicians redraw maps to protect their donors. 🧢 Run a deceptive campaign to override the citizen maps. Who loses? The voters of California. Who wins? partisan special-interests.

5/ Step 2: Lie that Prop 50 is temporary. It’s not. California’s Constitution allows redistricting only after the census, a referendum, or a court order. Prop 50 creates a fourth way, any time special interests want more seats, they can buy a new map.

4/ Here’s the truth: Texas fixed unconstitutional racial gerrymanders. They followed the law. That has nothing to do with California’s independent maps. Gavin is exploiting anti-Trump emotion to trick voters into abandoning their own principles.

3/ Their plan has 3 parts. Step 1: Lie to Democrats by blaming President Trump. They say Prop 50 is response to Trump destroying democracy. That’s pure gaslighting, playing upon Democrats suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

2/ Simple: Gavin wants power. Prop 50 isn’t about protecting democracy. It’s about launching his presidential campaign and handing California’s maps back to the same Sacramento insiders voters kicked out a decade ago. #VoteNoOnProp50

It’s fascinating, and infuriating, how Gavin Newsom, Barack Obama, and national Democrats are gaslighting their own voters over Prop 50. California Democrats overwhelmingly support our independent redistricting commission. So why is Gavin trying to kill it? 👇🧵👇Let me explain

How many people just realized that Dems had as many as 20 extra seats based on years of unconstitutional race-based gerrymandering?

10/ Callais could be the big step: From student admissions to voter maps, SCOTUS affirming we're finally one people under law. No more racial checkboxes in our Republic.

9/ If SCOTUS ends affirmative action for picking politicians, I can just imagine the howls from the left. Such a ruling will enforce our color-blind constitution. Legislators can't consider race when drafting laws. Why let them use race to draw congressional districts?

8/ If SCOTUS rules against Louisiana's map (as oral arguments hinted), it could gut race-driven redistricting nationwide. No more affirmative action for picking our politicians. States would draw fair, compact districts based on communities, not skin tone.

7/ Racial empowerment districts pack minorities together. Flip it: Would we tolerate majority-white mandates? Exactly. Time to realize MLK's dream that we "live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

Yesterday, we explored how your predictable routines become attack windows. Today, let’s look at what happens next: your financial negotiations and client relationships become commodities in the data broker marketplace.