So I decided to ask both Gemini and ChatGPT. And guess what? Gemini says they said what he claims they said and ChatGPT says the exact opposite!

And he blocks me right before telling me to ask AI. (Remember the days when people told you to Google it?) https://t.co/UNayKmrnZQ

I talk about the article and its claims (both the original and the edited version) here: https://t.co/lVz77RBegH

I just noticed that the article on @oneforisrael 's website where it is claimed that Isaiah 53 is a "forbidden chapter" (and which was stealth edited in 2023) was completely removed. The last copy of it on Waybackmachine was from July 3, 2025.

I've always found it a bit odd that Jewish converts to Christianity are sometimes referred to as "Jewish believers" thus implying (and sometimes stated explicitly) that Jews who follow their own religion are "non believers". In reality, all religious Jews are believers... in G-d!

I go into this in detail in my new article: https://t.co/YK8mIWIwZh

Why aren't these details mentioned? Why are they not explored? The answer is simple: They wish to push a *narrative* of "ancient rabbis said Isaiah 53 was about the Messiah" and those other sources go against such a narrative.

... missionaries who quotes Sanhedrin 98b which cites Isaiah 53 in connection with the name of the Messiah. What isn't mentioned? Sotah 14a which quotes Isaiah 53 in connection with Moses. Or Berachos 5a which quotes it in connection to the righteous.

... is the issue of *narrative*. And that is, instead of giving people a full and complete picture of what older rabbinic writings actually say *and* mean, they instead opt for a *narrative* of what they say. So, for example, Eduardo Arroyo is the latest in a long line of...

Recently, a video was posted by the missionaries "Jeff and Elisha" of So Be It! of an interview with the missionary Eduardo Arroyo regarding the interpretation of Isaiah 53 of "ancient Jewish sages". One of the things that personally bothers me about this...

My new article: The Missionaries’ Dilemma: A Look at Isaiah 53 and Rabbinic Interpretation

That being the case, it seems that this respect is merely a function of Islamic belief about them. And of course, what does this have to do with the current conflict? Absolutely nothing.

... position is similar to Judaism in that only G-d is infallible. He also says that this is how Islam respects Jesus and Mary. I wonder if the same level of respect is accorded to other religion's religious figures, such as Buddha for example. I am guessing it isn't.

A change from my usual focus on missionary claims... I see some people are retweeting a tweet from Khamenei. (I hope they realize that Khamenei didn't actually write it.) He says that Jesus and Mary are infallible. While I do not know much about Islam, I am pretty sure its...

He has also said in the past that he has proselytized in a synagogue, showing an utter lack of respect. So, perhaps I am wrong about his motivations but then, what other explanation is there?

He says he "cannot speak intelligently" about what has been kept from Jews. He says he cannot affirm that the "forbidden chapter" claim is true or not. So he admits ignorance on the subject. But he says he will continue repeating the claim regardless.

He then complained that I am questioning his motivations and blocked me. But let's look at what he's actually said.

... of exercising their cognitive facilities to realize that Netflix has absolutely nothing to do with Judaism.

Its amazing how some people's thought processes work. Apparently Netflix removed a quote from Isaiah 53 from a movie on their streaming platform and some people immediately think of the "forbidden chapter/omitted from synagogue readings" allegation without the slightest bit...

"But it’s still deceptive if they knowingly sidestep the facts: that Judaism engages the text, just not in a way that points to Jesus. They’re banking on their audience not digging deeper, which leans on rhetorical sleight-of-hand rather than honest engagement."