Great post by Carlo. Important lessons. Especially about learning agents, Not just chatbots but agent like will make the difference between students who struggle and those who will fly. Or between teachers who struggle or shine.

All modes offer feedback on both your answers and your reasoning. No shortcuts — just smarter, structured learning. Try it now

Join millions who have switched to Grok.

🧠 Explore mode – Learn any subject deeply. 📅 Organise mode – Plan smarter, reflect better. 📝 Challenge mode – Apply knowledge & sharpen reasoning. 🎭 Practice mode – Role play, simulate exams, teach others.

Meet the AI tutor changing how health professions students learn. Built with educators, backed by evidence, and powered by GPT — it adapts to your learning goals.

Our AI-powered tutor for health professions education! It teaches, coaches, challenges, and simulates, all in 1 intuitive interface. From deep learning to clinical role plays to portfolio coaching, it's just a chatbot; it's your personal AI tutor. 🔗

RT @InterestingSTEM: Future of education 🤔. She got a 1560 on a SAT - with no teacher since the 2nd grade…. She used “a lot of AI apps” htt….

Preparing Students for the Age of AI, Upheaval, and Opportunity .This blog post is worth a read. But we are finding that many students are still using AI in an ineffective way. That's why we include our study coach on

13/n Exciting times at NewMed as we build a truly evidence-based and student-centred medical education program! Stay tuned for more updates.

12/n ➡️Finally, it demands extensive staff and student training on feedback literacy. Everyone needs to understand how to give and receive feedback effectively.

11/n ➡️Ensuring constructive alignment and that relevance and fairness are baked into our curricular design. ➡️Blended feedback thrives with programmatic assessment and a strong focus on assessment *for* learning.

10/n ➡️Adapting the feedback combination to the learner's level – no one-size-fits-all here!.➡️ Being mindful of and adapting to the diverse cultural backgrounds of our learners. ➡️Clearly defining the purpose of *every* feedback event. Why are we giving this feedback?🤔.

9/n ➡️ Establishing strong, positive relationships between teachers and students.

8/n "Done well" for blended feedback requires several key elements:.➡️ A trusting learning culture where students feel safe to receive feedback.

7/n This leads us to blended feedback!🤝The literature strongly suggests it works very well *if* done right. But what exactly does "done well" mean in this context?👇.

6/n However, online feedback can limit personal connection and trust, lacks immediate dialogue, raises equity of access concerns, and requires tech proficiency.☹️.

5/n Online feedback offers flexibility, multimodality, time for reflection, anonymity, wider reach, and recordability💻.

4/n But F2F also has downsides: its ephemeral nature, potential for student anxiety/embarrassment, logistical challenges, and a higher risk of bias (including leniency bias).😬.

3/n Face-to-face feedback: Obvious wins include trust-building, rich non-verbal cues, direct dialogue, immediate improvement options, and timeliness.👍.

2/n Our design decisions are always based on thorough literature reviews. Our latest deep dive? The advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face, online, and blended feedback for our future medical students.🤔.

1/n So excited about the progress at NewMed, the hopefully soon-to-be-accredited new medical school in Australia! 📷 Our curriculum, assessment, and evaluation programs are not just comprehensive and innovative, but deeply rooted in evidence. #MedEd