
Joam Phoenix
@JxnW
Followers
607
Following
108K
Media
2K
Statuses
29K
i’m not trying to trick you … i’m trying to help
Joined January 2012
This is still a juvenile understanding. All choices are subject to influence, pressure, coercion. You "consent" to an employment contract under the threat of homelessness. You "consent" to drugs and alcohol after a lifetime of advertisement. Consenting to abuse is still abuse.
Consent is FREELY given. It’s not coerced, it’s not manipulated, it’s not pressured, it is not deceived. It is FREELY given! It can withdrawn at any point btw.
0
4
10
No need to congratulate me! I have been discussing pregnancy costs this entire time. Glad you found another vocabulary word to badly explain from the AI that you’re plugging all my responses into!. Worse than stupid, you are a waste of time.
Congratulations, this is called the cost/benefit analysis of viviparity. You see, with oviparity (animals that reproduce by laying eggs) the risk is that the eggs may be in danger or may be exposed to environmental issues that may risk the developing fetus inside.
0
0
8
For example, if you read the paper I linked here, it covers the role of VE-cadherin in trophoblast invasion. Cadherins and other adhesion molecules are some of the oncogenes that contribute to the development of cancer, in all humans.
Here is Stanford Medicine describing the human placenta as “uniquely invasive.”. The barrier you are referring to is between fetal trophoblast cells and maternal spiral arteries. Here is a recent paper on endovascular invasion.
1
0
5
The role of fetal microchimerism in cancer is unresolved. There is evidence both for cancer development and protection. That’s not even what I was referring to. The invasive capacity required by fetal trophoblasts predispose all of our cells to cancers.
2
0
5
They are issues of hypertension that are exacerbated during pregnancy because: the human placenta is uniquely invasive and takes control of a relatively large portion of the maternal blood supply (30-40% of cardiac output).
Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia are issues of hypertension. The vast majority of cases are the result of PRE-EXISTING HEALTH CONDITIONS OF THE MOTHER like obesity and diabetes. Other cases are brought about by multiple births (like twins) or genetics.
1
0
5
I don’t know what else to tell you except read a book.
@shamanspirit13 "highly invasive placentas" has to be the most terminally online thing I've read in weeks tbh
2
0
5
Here is Stanford Medicine describing the human placenta as “uniquely invasive.”. The barrier you are referring to is between fetal trophoblast cells and maternal spiral arteries. Here is a recent paper on endovascular invasion.
First of all, placentas are not "highly invasive." On the contrary, there is a blood-placental-barrier that limits what is passed between fetus and mother. Second, pre-eclampsia affects between 2-8% of pregnancies worldwide.
2
0
7
Painful childbirth is just the start. Humans have highly invasive placentas to support rapid development, contributing to preeclampsia. The female immune system is stronger to compensate, which contributes to autoimmunity. The invasive capacity also predisposes us to cancer.
I’d argue that women’s bodies were not actually “designed to give birth” tbh. Human pregnancy + birth is an evolutionary nightmare compared to other primate species. The narrower pelvises humans developed in order to become bipedal make birth much more difficult than it could be.
2
1
15