Taiwan’s 2050 #EnergyTransition is bold, but how can policy better serve communities? This article by Natalie W. M. Wong in @Journal_PDP examines collaborative innovation in Taiwan’s #RenewableEnergy sector. Read here:

How should we evaluate co-created public services? This new article in @Journal_PDP by Ahmee Kim and Hyung Jun Park proposes a design-led model rooted in systems thinking & citizen participation. Read the full article here:

Can “misleading” policy goals actually help push reforms? . In @Journal_PDP, @kidjiesaguin introduces decoy goals—strategic aims used to make controversial policies more palatable amidst institutional uncertainty. Read the full article here:

Can Design Thinking solve wicked problems in the public sector?. This new article by Källström et al. in @Journal_PDP demonstrates how a DT workshop facilitated collaboration and policy implementation in local government. Read here:.

When does collaboration drive innovation, and when does it stall? . Guo & Mallinson explore tensions in collaborative energy policy in their new article in @Journal_PDP. Innovation needs adaptive design & ongoing trust. Read here:

How do well-meaning policies unintentionally deepen #FoodInsecurity?. This article in @Journal_PDP by Bijlani et al. uses #SystemsThinking and causal loop diagrams to unpack policy blind spots. Building trust and redistributing responsibility are key.

Take a look at the latest issue of PDP!. Vol 8, Issue 1 (2025) features insights on democratic policy design, GIS tools, health system alignment, data governance, and more. Read the full issue here

Policy Innovation Labs (PILs) are growing worldwide 🌍. 🧪Can they advance democratic innovation too?. Leah Levac & Wai Yin Chan explore a Canadian case where community-engaged scholarship might be a missing link 🔍. Read more:

Catch up with the trending, most cited, and most read articles from our latest issues! 📢. Trending and most read: Most Cited:

🧠 Can policymaking reflect diverse ways of knowing?. What if Indigenous knowledge was woven into policy design?. 🤝 What does true co-design look like?. This new study explores a culturally grounded framework for co-design. Read further:

🚨 Can public servants drive bold change?.🤝 What if collaboration is a design challenge?.🌍 Can local visions fuel national transitions?. New study out on Catalonia’s Shared-Agendas initiative explores these questions!. 🔍 Read more:

RT @Journal_PDP: The 2024 Scopus CiteScores are out, and Policy Design and Practice has done very well! . 𝗪𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗦𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝟵.𝟯!. We a….

RT @Journal_PDP: Working on critical policy problems & solutions? 🔍. Policy Design and Practice is an open access, peer-reviewed journal pu….

Working on critical policy problems & solutions? 🔍. Policy Design and Practice is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing fresh ideas to improve public policy worldwide. Submit or learn more:

What if institutional frameworks exist—but innovation still stalls? 🤔. This new article in @Journal_PDP by Di Mascio, Coletti & Natalini shows why #LeadershipMatters for #PublicSectorInnovation, based on 30 years of #AdministrativeReform in Italy. 🔗

How do you get innovation when stakeholders don’t trust each other? David Weimer’s latest in @Journal_PDP shows how constructed collaboration can bridge divided networks—w/ lessons from U.S. organ transplant reform. Read 👉.

The 2024 Scopus CiteScores are out, and Policy Design and Practice has done very well! . 𝗪𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗦𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝟵.𝟯!. We are ranked.➡️ 13 among 242 journals of PA.➡️ 15 out of 738 journals of Political Science & IR. We thank everyone for another great year!

RT @GmoCejudo: “The complexity of contemporary policy problems demands rethinking policy analysis education and reorienting it toward enhan….

RT @howlettm: Now out in issue and Open Access: "New policy tools and traditional policy models: better understanding behavioural, digital….

Can a policy be doomed from the start? This piece in @Journal_PDP by @AnnaMalandrino, Maria Tullia Galanti & Giovanni Barbato shows how flaws in the law itself—vague goals and incoherent systems—can predict failure before implementation begins. Read here: