The hardest path you will face in this life is just like the Matrix:. The blue pill— An echo chamber. Full of followers, engagement, attention, a public image. The red pill— A mirror 🪞. Some people’s worst nightmare is to face themselves alone.

Is the data still “classified” if a civilian with basic open source hardware and a python script detects it?! 📡📊💽.

RT @stellarQlabs: @JenniferAun Spicy SIGINT 🌶️📡.

Comms check? Do you read me? I smell a signal throttle… OVER.

DATA doesn’t lie 📊💽.

I will be publishing a case study/paper I’ll be submitting to IEEE on how I even came across this agency and found this project. It will be technically spicy 🌶️ 🤓.

Power isn’t just about what you can do. It’s about what others believe you’re willing to do.

01000111 01010010 01001111 01001011 00111111.

If you’re only optimizing for yourself, you’re playing checkers. Game theory is chess — and most people don’t even know they’re on the board ♟️

The real game isn’t just strategy. It’s knowing when to be predictable… and when to become chaos ♟️

John Von Neumann’s insight: .Rational decisions don’t always look rational in isolation. Sometimes you play to deny someone else’s win, not to maximize your own ♟️. (It’s why “tit for tat” often beats pure selfishness.)

John von Neumann saw games as models of life:.– Players don’t know everything. – Resources are limited. – Every move creates ripples you can’t fully predict. Sound familiar? That’s not Monopoly. That’s geopolitics. That’s your daily decisions.

Most people think “game theory” is about winning. It’s not. It’s about surviving when everyone else is trying to win — at your expense.

Tell me you don’t understand AI without telling me you don’t understand AI 🤦‍♀️🤣 Don’t fall for the paid PR hype. Meta didn’t invent self‑improving AI — they just slapped a press release on the same fine‑tuning everyone’s been doing for years 💀.

RT @JenniferAun: “A player who understands the rules can win. But a player who designs the rules—sets the scope, defines the payoffs, and s….

#shadowbanned #glitch #test

Breakdown: Why the “Endless Generative Waveforms” Experiment Fails at Basic Science 🔬. IARPA’s NGEN: Endless Generative Waveforms solicitation claims to:. “Develop AI‑driven, adaptive communication waveforms that are undetectable, unjammable, and can operate in contested.

@grok @elonmusk IARPA (and programs like End‑Gen) also avoid the scrutiny of “human testing” rules by framing their work as “infrastructure or system testing.”. Instead of saying “we’re testing on people,” they say “we’re testing new communication protocols in real‑world environments.”. The.

What’s really going on with IARPA’s End‑Gen:. It’s being sold as “next‑gen communication.” .*Faster. Smarter. More secure.*. That’s not the game. This isn’t about communication. They frame it like a military comms upgrade — but what they’re really doing is letting AI generate

🔹Problem #1: No standards = no interoperability. Every “mission waveform” becomes a unique snowflake. Great for black‑ops stealth. Terrible for robust, multi‑party communication. 🔹Problem #2: Security nightmare. If AI is inventing the waveform… who vets it?.Who guarantees.