Who stands to gain from a plea deal with the prosecutor in crypto phone/ pgp evidence cases: the defendant or the attorney? I wrote a column on the subject.

The Court accepted the defence position that an attachment or seizure order does not alter ownership of the asset. Consequently, the individual retains full standing and all procedural rights to participate as a private prosecutor in the proceedings. The collaboration in this

The Investigating Judge and the Public Prosecutor had denied our client the right to appear as a Private Prosecutor (acusación particular) alongside the Public Prosecutor, on the grounds that a crypto wallet exceeding €11 million – seized during a search of the client’s

Successful cross-border collaboration between @intercrimeda members @JaimeCampaner and @Moszkowicz results in a significant procedural victory. The Provincial Court of Málaga (Audiencia Provincial) has allowed the appeal filed on behalf of our client and has quashed two prior

Hereby I share my report on the methods, techniques, and parties involved in the EncroChat and SkyECC hacks. I wrote this because I have noticed that there is an information deficit among defense teams, which makes it difficult for them to properly interpret and refute the often

Intercrime Defence Alliance: A network of international criminal defense attorneys specializing in cross-border cases, now live and operational as of November 2025. We coordinate expertise in extraditions and multi-jurisdictional arrests, Interpol notices, digital evidence

Our member @moszkowicz has published a new column on Crimesite – the Netherlands’ leading organized crime news platform – analyzing the latest judicial developments regarding PGP and encrypted communication evidence (including recent rulings on EncroChat and Sky ECC,). Read the

Just published a new column on Crimesite why encrypted evidence is crumbling: from the French Cour de Cassation to the ECtHR, Swiss courts and even New York – EncroChat & SkyECC proof is getting dismissed. Read it here:

The European Court of Human Rights has today communicated the case Silgir v. Germany (no. 2) (app. no. 22234/25) to the German Government. This is the first EncroChat case to reach this stage before the Strasbourg Court. Allow me to outline the essentials.

Today we launch Intercrime Defence Alliance