@HoministPapers @DannyDrinksWine and suddenly you believe Hollywood's golden boy is capable of anything—even evil and treacherous deeds....the jolly charm is gone...

@HoministPapers @DannyDrinksWine Cary Grant was unique in his own right, and he remains so to this day. There will never be another actor quite like him. However, even Cary Grant couldn't play every role. Can you imagine him as a cowboy? No, you can't — but you could imagine Clark Gable.

https://t.co/tA7jwShMTZ This is what happens when you censor free speech. Government incompetence cannot be criticized at the risk of more deaths.

https://t.co/2lrMtbhLM1 The second video after the one on the sexist chick Kaitlin Collins shows Hungarian Steel Workers: ALL OF THEM ARE MEN. So are men going to always be doing all the tough jobs while chicks get to present the news?

https://t.co/pzvtxDwjP9 Here we have women ALL COIFFED LIKE LITTLE PRINCESSES & they can't understand differences between the sexes that they themselves embody in the way they dress!

https://t.co/qXomx0orKI All power tends to corrupt & absolute power corrupts absolutely. But also WHEREVER YOU FIND A WOMAN, you find the END OF CIVILIZATION.

Another user I have to block. I block all users that prevent direct replies. NOT bc I want a direct reply but it's too much trouble to post a comment twice. BLOCKED

Tell that to Beethoven, Michelangelo (who slept in his work clothes while painting the Sistine Chapel) or any creative person. Laborare est orare:to work is to pray. Nuns know that when their hands are not doing work they should tuck them into the folds of their habit.

4/4 force too, for the same reason. Freud (prob. out of masculine pride) only saw the latter but not also the former; yet any woman can rape a man just be popping her boobs out. We know this for a FACT (or spreading her legs in a professor's office &c.).

3/4 their best work around women. NATURE DESIGNED MEN THAT WAY. Remember the hominist argument that Nature has only ONE GOAL: the maximum reproduction of the species; hence She designed men to be very vulnerable to any sexual provocation just as she designed men to take women by

2/3 in the presence of ANY woman, and you can see why this will cause problems for men & ult. our entire society bc men will never do their best work around women. Surely no one SERIOUSLY believes that women are better intellectually than men: the problem is men will never do

The FACT is, Kailtin Collins KNOWS if she dressed like a man in every aspect: covered up her body; cut her hair, gave up cosmetics, earrings, &c. NO MAN WOULD LOOK AT HER TWICE. All women KNOW this which is why they depend on feminine allure. Add to this that MEN ARE STUPID 1/2

5/5 TO MIX IN SCHOOLS OR WORK & even w/o that admixture society imposed strict sumptuary dress codes on women. And let's address another issue, the BS of "policing women's bodies": women wd have an argument if MEN EXPOSED THEMSELVES BUT MEN DON'T.

4/5 what happened with hemlines. Even an inch above the created a scandal: today women parade in dresses an inch below the crotch! Related to this is another hominist principle: the evolutionary need of women to dress to sexually arouse men. That's why WE CAN'T ALLOW WOMEN & MEN

3/4 gender pay gap soon becomes one dollar & then women make only 80% of what men make &c. But the same principle applies to female sexism. Today a woman wears brighter colors than a man, tomorrow she exposes some chest area, next day most of her chest area is exposed. We saw

2/3repeatedly criticized the sexist attire of Kaitlin Collins but this is how it has progressed. Hominism has est. basic principles inc. 1. any gendered difference makes a difference, 2. a gendered difference will tend to EXPAND in the time it is allowed to exist. A one cent

https://t.co/ep7W88EyTw HOW LONG B4 MEN EMBRACE HOMINISM? One of the fundamental axioms of hominism is called the Progressive Principle, which is that gender differences tend to expand, which is why they are not only WRONG in themselves but become worse over time. I have 1/2

https://t.co/VFVK6fbQu2 This is PRECISELY what I mean by INADEQUATE IDEAS of women as PEOPLE ("the radical notion that women are PEOPLE"). How can men form ADEQUATE ideas of women as people if they DRESS LIKE THIS? You know the kind of woman who used to dress like this?

“The most avid proponents of the post-War Amendments undoubtedly intended them to remove all legal distinctions among ‘all persons born or naturalized in the United States.’" Brown v Board of Education, 1954

2/2 recently concluded war between the states, inc. the attempt to punish "rebels" & to grant citizenship to Black people already living in the US.