@GeologicalSETI
Bruce R. Fenton
11 months
People want you to argue over David Grusch's character instead of asking for evidence of his claims. At this point his background doesn't matter, only whether he's given locations of alien craft and they've been seized. Everything else is basically pointless distraction.
28
24
168

Replies

@nexuseditor1
Duncan Roads
11 months
@GeologicalSETI Grusch's handler is CIA. Nolan is CIA. So are the rest of the inner team. This is all an intel psyop - with the leak designed to cement support for Grusch via sympathy. It is working like a charm thanks to the noobness of ufotwitter folk.
1
0
1
@GeologicalSETI
Bruce R. Fenton
11 months
@nexuseditor1 It seems very obvious that the new 'attack' on Grusch has been done to make him a hero to ufologists who will fall for the idea that it is an IC attack to discredit him. It has indeed worked very well, most fell for it right away.
2
0
2
@DGilesPhd
Douglas Giles, PhD
11 months
@GeologicalSETI Yes, ad hominem has no place in any discussion. Every person's claims should be judged on their merits and related evidence. That includes David Grusch.
1
0
2
@GeologicalSETI
Bruce R. Fenton
11 months
@DGilesPhd Unfortunately a lot has been hung on Grusch being a super credible upstanding man and expert witness, rather than supporting evidence. That has encouraged sceptics to simply question his credibility and upstanding character. What all parties should have done is stick to…
2
0
2
@makingtuk
William G Strouse, CHRISTIAN, Retired!
11 months
@GeologicalSETI If there was no fire, there would be no smoke and no need to Discredit the witness. Distraction, diversion & cancellation are tools of lawyers and the intel community.
1
0
0
@GeologicalSETI
Bruce R. Fenton
11 months
@makingtuk However, if there was actually evidence provided to us all of this would be a non issue.
1
0
0
@IlSospetto2
Il Sospetto
11 months
@GeologicalSETI But you understand he gave that info, right?
1
0
0
@GeologicalSETI
Bruce R. Fenton
11 months
@IlSospetto2 No, he hasn't. The SCIF never happened in the end.
1
0
1
@Striplar
Roger Froud
11 months
@GeologicalSETI It was exactly the same for Bob Lazar. It became, and is still, all about personal stuff that's irrelevant to the central thrust of the claims. It's how they get you to look away from what's being hidden.
1
0
0
@GeologicalSETI
Bruce R. Fenton
11 months
@Striplar It's only possible because so little or no solid supporting evidence is being offered
1
0
0
@ThreeZelda
ZeldaThree
11 months
@GeologicalSETI Classic manipulation. Direct attention to characters instead of facts.
0
0
2
@JohnBaehr22
John Bridges
11 months
@GeologicalSETI Not entirely correct - he wraps his claims in inaccessible TSSCI procedure so even to Congress and Senate they will never be publically accessible without Senate sponsorship and Presidential approval. However what can be checked are his background and claims of access …/1
1
0
0
@OscillateDaily
Just James
11 months
@GeologicalSETI His character is a nice red herring but to be fair your character often decides if people will believe you or not.
0
0
0
@LlewelynStayte
Llewelyn Stayte
11 months
@GeologicalSETI Injection of plausible deniability
0
0
0
@EchelonDenver
Echelon_Sky_Denver /π•πŸ›π“‚€
11 months
@GeologicalSETI @DaveyJohnston That third of voting America is the losing party. Let them find-out in ontologic shock.
0
0
0
@DeepSpace41
Jerry Boggs
11 months
0
0
0
@TRandallizer
Ed Randall πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§
11 months
@GeologicalSETI Basically yes. The UFOs are there or they aren’t. That’s the story.
0
0
1
@mayor_winston
Mayor Winston
11 months
@GeologicalSETI First earth battalion strikes again πŸ˜†
0
0
0
@fredericks44
Jon Fredericks πŸ€
11 months
@GeologicalSETI It’s the latest (sadly) β€˜look at the shiny object over here’ canard. Let’s say I play along and I’m getting the β€˜vapors’ over the fact that a reporter printed publicly available information about Grusch. Now SHOW ME the proof ! If you can’t your just the latest version of Lazar.
0
0
1
@RealBedeekin
Ben Phillips
11 months
0
0
0