
Jake Feala
@FealaJake
Followers
516
Following
406
Media
8
Statuses
195
Automating the loop of science. Co-founder @LilaSciences.
Joined July 2020
RT @OptimalBayes: @Sara_Imari Causation is just an arbitrary line we draw when a model provides highly accurate predictive & explanatory po….
0
1
0
RT @wasserstein_rao: Automating experiments with AI is going to be really hard because automation is way less about high-dimensional Bayesi….
0
25
0
RT @US_FDA: In a historic first for the agency, @DrMakaryFDA today announced an aggressive timeline to scale use of artificial intelligence….
0
95
0
RT @OptimalBayes: @Sara_Imari This is just not true. Automating science is easy in theory, just hard in practice. In theory, all we have to….
0
1
0
Gospel. Lila was built on the power of closed-loop workflows in science.
Progress in biology is too slow. Even simple experiments often take several days of work to complete. Software, by contrast, compiles in seconds. It's what makes programming "flow-inducing.". We need faster feedback loops in biology. Our latest article explains where to start🔻
0
0
2
Wolfram suggests some systems are “computationally irreducible,” i.e. you can only get the complete solution through full simulation. I’d love to know if some subsystems (obviously not all) in biology are *fundamentally* irreducible and therefore we can only hope to either.
obviously we know a ton about biology, and obviously there is a ton we don't understand. But what is the ratio?.Are we almost there in our quest to understand cell behavior? Or have we landed on tiny islands of comprehensibility among a vast sea of irreducible complexity?.
2
0
2
RT @koeng101: I saw this paper, and several people sent it to me. Quite similar to what I've been doing for a while, so I wanted to give my….
0
40
0
RT @jrkelly: @FealaJake Vast sea still I think, certainly for higher organisms. Maybe there is hope in microbes.
0
1
0
RT @kulesatony: 🚀 Fellowship applications are OPEN for Encode: AI for Science. What if you could use AI to.- Design shape-shifting robots….
0
68
0