ChloeNibourel Profile Banner
Chloe Nibourel Profile
Chloe Nibourel

@ChloeNibourel

Followers
66
Following
59
Media
3
Statuses
25

PhD candidate in Economics | Stockholm School of Economics | IIES, Stockholm University

Joined August 2023
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@dorotheafrenkel
Siri Isaksson
1 year
🚨💃🏻 PLEASE SHARE💃🏻🚨 Im on the JM 2 move closer 2 family in Lyon- all jobs with direct flight / train to Lyon are interesting. I’m currently working on 3 funded promising projects on AI 🤖 My JMP is under review at QJE has been covered by the Economist etc more info->
@NHHEcon
NHH Department of Economics
1 year
Job Market Candidates 2024: @NHHEco, @TheChoiceLab and @FAIR_CELE proudly presents @dorotheafrenkel, @dannielduque, @Paula_Navarro1 and @TtacWang as candidates @EconJobMarket 2024/2025. Read more about them here:
3
35
69
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
1 year
Excited to share Patrizia’s JMP! She shows how elder care subsidies not only improve health outcomes for the elderly but also protect their children’s careers from further disruptions. Overall, the Swedish reform ended up paying for itself.
@IIES_Sthlm
Institute for International Economic Studies
1 year
Introducing our #EconJMC @PatriziaMassner. In her #EconJMP “Should Elder Care Be Subsidized? Theory and Evidence from Sweden” she examines the impact of a 2002 elder care fee reform that lowered costs by 40% on avg. for 2/3 of Sweden’s municipalities. https://t.co/EjpLglvXh9 1/6
0
0
10
@TBourany
Thomas Bourany
1 year
I'm excited to share my JMP "The Optimal Design of Climate Agreements" where I study carbon taxation and trade tariffs in the presence of free-riding incentives and inequality, which is related to current discussions on trade policies and climate action #EconTwitter #COP29 🧵1/10
1
34
146
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
1 year
Check out Claire's JMP on the crucial issue of low take-up in welfare programs. She finds that better information, not just higher benefits, is key to increasing participation.
@CrestUmr
CREST (UMR 9194)
1 year
🚨#EconJobMarket🎓 How can policies better reach those in need? In her #JobMarketPaper, @c_leroy_ studies how information 📢 and incentives 💸 can encourage social benefit take-up. #EconTwitter 👉 https://t.co/DIoUlfHobx
0
0
1
@jenniferdoleac
Jennifer Doleac
1 year
Claire Leroy JMP: "Raising Take-up of Welfare Programs: Evidence from a Large French Reform" Website: https://t.co/fQjyHC0enF
1
2
2
@gabrieleaopinto
gabriele pinto
1 year
I'm working on a new project using Machine Learning to extract data from videos 🎥💻 The goal is to explore "video-as-data" for political and communication research. My case study analyzes 2000+ video episodes of two popular Italian political talk shows👇🧵 https://t.co/Bv1UIfpZao
3
26
142
@SITEStockholm
Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics (SITE)
2 years
📆📢MARK YOUR CALENDAR! Join us on 19 April for a workshop on 'The Political Economy of Environmental Policy' with keynote speakers Torsten Persson @IIES_Sthlm & @MichaelAklin @EPFL_en. 🌱Explore the intersection of #economics & #environmentalpolicy. https://t.co/P2Kak7l1M0
0
7
8
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
Great reminder of the positive sides of academia in this tough JM time. So many interesting projects were presented yesterday. 💡 Thanks to all the organizers at @Unicatt in Milan!
@IcoTrombetta
Federico Trombetta
2 years
70 submissions; More than 60 registered participants; 20 presenters + 2 keynotes from 18 different institutions; A great day of top-notch political economy research. Thank you everyone for your contribution to the 1st UniCatt Political Economy Workshop! #Econtwitter
0
0
6
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
Find more details on “How Do Voters and Parties Respond to the Radical Right?” here https://t.co/s1GNE19iIj 15/15
0
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
Summary: RR candidates boost participation, motivate their own base, and force left-wing parties to coordinate. RR candidates also have major impacts on electoral dynamics to the extent that they radically change the winning probabilities of their opponents. 14/15
1
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
All mainstream top candidates benefit from having RR RUNNERS-UP. Top runners whose main challengers come from the RR are certain to win, while top runners against other mainstream candidates only win in 87% of the races. 13/15
1
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
RR OUTSIDERS reduce the votes of the Conservative party more than the votes of the Social-Democratic party. ⏩The probability of winning the race for left-wing candidates goes from 50 to 60%. 12/15
1
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
Importantly, RR candidates, even if they do not win, affect the probabilities of winning of the opponents! 11/15
1
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
Regarding opposing parties, do they collaborate more with each other when RR runs? I find evidence of strategic exit of left-wing candidates but only when another left-wing candidate is already qualified. (No ‘Front Rebublicain’ in my setting) 10/15
1
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
I compile precise election results at the ballot box level to show that the increase in turnout rates mainly comes from neighborhoods that already voted a lot for the RR. ⏩ The main drivers of the boost in participation are the pro-RR voters. 9/15
1
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
But, is it because RR parties mobilize new voters who did not like any of the mainstream parties? Or is it because people who strongly oppose the RR now feel ‘threatened’ and therefore come to vote? 8/15
1
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
Some contexts, such as highly polarized or competitive races make the voters’ response even stronger. 7/15
1
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
I find that RR OUTSIDERS increase turnout rates in Round 2 by 1pp (baseline 60%). And, RR RUNNERS-UP increase turnout rates by 2pp (baseline 50%). 6/15
1
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
The main difference between the experiments is the probability of winning: OUTSIDERS win in 3.5% of the races whereas RUNNERS-UP win in 15%. This might affect the intensity of voters’ responses. 5/15
1
0
0
@ChloeNibourel
Chloe Nibourel
2 years
I have two quasi-experiments, both using Regression Discontinuity Designs: 1⃣ The OUTSIDER experiment: RR competes against two stronger candidates in Round 2. 2⃣ The RUNNER-UP experiment: RR candidates are the main challengers in two-candidate races. 4/15
1
0
0