I’m not sure there’s anyone out there who is writing better amicus briefs these days than
@CecereCarl
. This one, in our case on New York’s double-taxation scheme for intangible income, is well worth a read.
Today, SCOTX ruled 8-1 in favor of my client on a legal position that he was sanctioned for advancing in the trial court.
Numerous judges thought his argument was frivolous. But it was actually correct.
This is among the most gratifying wins of my career.
A Constitution Day thought:
There are many things wrong with Qualified Immunity. One of the worst is this: When you tell your client *why* they lost, they lose all faith. They immediately believe there is no such thing as justice and their rights mean nothing. And they're right.
Look at them sit there in their comfortable chairs in a well-appointed library, talking about fomenting revolution with blood, and then putting it down with more blood.
As if they were playing parlor games.
There’s really nothing sicker.
John Eastman says that if Trump's effort to overturn the 2020 election had been successful, "one hopes that our military" would have understood its obligation to quell any riots because failure to do so would mean "subjecting yourself to mob rule."
We just filed this motion for leave to intervene in the SEC v. Ripple Case, which seeks billions in penalties from Ripple based on its cryptocurrency XRP, which the SEC claims is an unregistered security.
here's the brief:
Roughly 1 in 3 Americans (32%) – including nearly half of men (46%) – are confident they could safely land a passenger airplane in an emergency situation, relying only on the assistance of air traffic control. Just 1 in 5 women say the same.
Incredibly gratifying, huge news from SCOTUS today.
We’re confident that the Court will foil the Sacklers’ historic abuse of the bankruptcy system, and curb the abuse of third-party releases in mass-tort bankruptcies.
Looking forward to arguing this in December.
BIG:
#SCOTUS
just ruled on a pending shadow docket request about the effect of Purdue Pharma's bankruptcy on the Sacklers and possible opioid crisis-related claims.
The court granted a stay, agreed to hear the case, and specified the question presented.
We think those documents should be available to the public so that everyone can evaluate for themselves whether the SEC’s case against Ripple is legitimate and a proper use of taxpayer dollars.
Quick legal writing thread that applies to lawyerly development more broadly:
When you're a young lawyer, you will try to write well only to realize you've failed.
I'm strongly in favor of accountability for the lawyers that are pushing these baseless conspiracy theories posing as lawsuits. Monetary sanctions or even disbarment would be on the table for me.
Listen clients, I'm super happy to follow all your billing guidelines. Great, no problem.
The thing is there's not that many ways to break up the task "write and revise this thing" into a bunch of different mini-tasks.
And that's like 80% of what I do.
Dear
@Westlaw
it is insane that your copy-and-paste feature still produces dumb quotation marks. The whole idea of copying directly from the source is to ensure that the quote is accurate and you are introducing errors that have to be fixed and it makes me absolutely bonkers.
On a more serious note to you young attorneys and law students: get you a fitness plan. It’s vital for your brain, your soul, and to make sure you don’t die 15 years into your career.
I represent Rosyln Layton, a columnist and scholar, who seeks to intervene in this action to oppose the sealing of certain documents that the SEC offered in support of its summary judgment motion.
And the documents will shed light on whether those within the SEC thought the guidance given in the speech might have varied from settled expectations on the application of the securities laws to cryptocurrencies.
One of the perverse things about these election lawsuits is that merely dressing an idea up in legal clothing makes it carry weight to nonlawyers. Lawyers have often exploited this tendency. And they are doing so now.
Sometimes I feel like you Twitter people stir up trouble and hurt people simply because you do not have enough to do.
And I’m here to tell you I have a yard and a farm and a law firm and I will find you something to do.
Ok Mr. Practicing Attorney. This is an EXHIBIT to a motion for leave to file. Not the actual amended complaint. It’s a blue-lined doc per FRCP.
The judge’s s/ is a courtesy so that if he approves, all he has to do is place his seal.
I can see why you’re a pundit at CNN. 😂
The documents Rosyln seeks are critical to that defense, because they relate to the only guidance that the SEC has offered on whether cryptocurrencies might be considered securities, which came in a speech that then-Director of Corporation Finance William Hinman gave in 2018.
One of the key aspects of the case is whether Ripple had fair notice that its cryptocurrency might be subject to the securities laws, since it is a currency, and not a security.
And by the by,
I got news of my first cert grant in what’s turning out to be one of the most significant SCOTUS bankruptcy cases in a generation while my son and I were bombing down “Gopherit” until we were blue in the face.
And I saw a fox.
That’s a top-ten day for sure.
Incredibly gratifying, huge news from SCOTUS today.
We’re confident that the Court will foil the Sacklers’ historic abuse of the bankruptcy system, and curb the abuse of third-party releases in mass-tort bankruptcies.
Looking forward to arguing this in December.
My thoughts are on my Mom today, who only got three months to enjoy the backyard garden she'd longed for her entire life before cancer took her with vengeance.
Now the garden's grass again. plowed up and gone.
Nothing's promised. Not one day.
It's been a long time coming, but Monday is the argument in Harrington v. Purdue, our case challenging the validity of Purdue’s scheme to immunize the Sackler family, Purdue’s former owners, for their starring role in creating the opioid crisis, which is now a worldwide epidemic.
My periodic reminder that naturalization ceremonies are the most moving event in American civic life by a mile and they're free to the public. You'll walk away a different person than when you came.
Proud to announce the grand opening of the Telluride, CO office of Cecere PC! Enjoy these views from the “conference room.”
We’re open for business. But, you know, not *too* much business.
#AppellateTwitter
Never trust a lawyer who tells you they’re going to get “fun” information about an opponent in discovery that will be useful outside the litigation. Discovery is never fun. And anything juicy will be produced under a protective order that guarantees it’ll
(2/2) and then the fun begins as he gets a deep dive into MM’s operations, decision making and funding. I spoke w two top white collar attorneys who are pretty sure the case survives motion to dismiss. Developing
Been thinking about Federalist 55, and Publius’s admission that the Republic’s secret sauce is the “virtue” in its citizens and leaders.
Without it, “nothing less than the chains of despotism can restrain them from destroying and devouring one another.”
So I'm betting that many of you greeted your return to work yesterday with a thought that thousands of other lawyers had yesterday:
"Maybe I should go solo."
Unsure of the future, Yaryna Arieva and Sviatoslav Fursin rushed their wedding and got married to the sounds of sirens blaring the Russian invasion.
Straight after their wedding, they both joined the local Territorial Defense Center to help efforts to defend the country.
🇺🇦
@obarcala
@bradheath
The very idea of asking for a continuance on an emergency attempt to stop certification of a Presidential election just strikes me as unwise.
It's been 10 years since my brain surgery. And I just wanted to take a moment to thank the amazing, dedicated people of
@MDAndersonNews
, my brilliant surgeon, Dr. Sayed Azeem, and everyone who supported me when I couldn't even hold myself up
In retrospect, the most unrealistic thing about Star Wars might not be the lightsabers, faster-than-light speed travel, or the Force.
It might be underestimating the groundswell of popular support that Darth Vader would enjoy.
Hey clerks, past, current, and future:
I know there's nothing so intoxicating as that whiff of power you get standing next to a federal judge.
But if I hear of you being snotty toward the litigants before you, or toward less credentialed lawyers, you are dead to me.
What 15 years of marriage looks like:
for him—couples bike ride.
For her—flowers.
For us—badass sushi and vampire tv time while the kids are at school.
What I’m saying is 15 years of marriage is awesome!
This is exactly what my brain tumor looked like. And I could not sleep until it was out of my head. I cannot imagine the anger and agony of having to endure that tortuous wait longer because ICU beds are full of unvaccinated people with covid.
This is a photo of my brain tumour. My surgery was originally scheduled for today, but I received a call yesterday afternoon that the surgery has been cancelled indefinitely. Please call, email, or share this post with our government officials. Thank you!
Folks there is such a thing as a “failure to clash” and do not let it happen in your briefs. There are few things more frustrating than reading two side’s briefs where each has a completely different view of the world and neither ever explains what is wrong with the other’s view.
Although
@RoslynLayton
’s motion filed by
@CecereCarl
has been deemed moot, it was important that it was filed. In litigation, wins are not always counted by actual rulings. You can’t unring a 🔔
Spouse: "Hey whatcha doin?"
Me: (not at all defensively) "I'm running a sophisticated, cloud-based law firm! I'm litigating in multiple states! I'm answering emails from important people!"
Spouse: "You're on Twitter, aren't you?"
Me: "Shhh,
@MaxKennerly
said something stupid."
The D.C. Circuit’s war on Garamond illustrates a bigger problem in the federal courts of appeals, which is that the uniformity of the rules has broken down. There’s no good reason for most of the variation and it imposes real costs on practicing lawyers.
#AppellateTwitter
This is such good news.
Think how many times a partner has demanded you find a case on a principle of law so elementary that no case has bothered to actually say it.
We're gonna have a whole body of elementary law come out of this fiasco.
The extent to which the courts are being forced to explain totally elementary parts of law to Trump’s lawyers is killing me. Today, it’s the proposition that “parties present their evidence” in trial court.
BREAKING NEWS: Cecere PC will be opening offices this summer in Big Sky, Montana and Telluride, Colorado.
We’ll be open for business, but not too much business!
I’ve said this before, but it bears repeating: there’s no such thing as a “courageous” tweet. There are no righteous Twitter “battles,” and no one “wins.” There are no sick “burns” that change people’s minds. It’s just people typing into their phones.
@admindotlaw
I run the other direction. I think you should quote as much as possible from authorities. I think the best brief is the one that leaves the impression that it doesn’t contain anything new, so the court doesn’t have to step out on its own. Lots of quotes give that impression.
To all those who wonder if they will ever be satisfied with their work product, I offer the following:
I spent all morning being pissed at myself about a passage in a brief in a case that I won.
Dear SCOTX, 4,500 words is simultaneously way too short for my excellent, grantworthy petitions, and way too long for my opponents' frivolous, fact-bound petitions.
BREAKING: ERCOT is now asking people to conserve electricity through Friday, saying there are a significant number of power plants offline and expecting possible record use for June.
Trump's Truth Social company posted its new financials to the SEC today.
The firm generated just $4.1 million (with an M) revenue for all of 2023, while racking up $58 million in net losses.
Market cap is > $6 billion.
(This isn't an April 1 joke.)
@FrozoneAKOKAL
Courtroom 2 (interior, day)
Judge: Assume I've read your briefs. I will now ask you a series of questions in which i reveal in every possible way that I have not yet read your briefs.