在过去的一段时间里，我与我父母持续遭受多次恶意行为侵害。包括骚扰 、侮辱以及严重失实的诽谤内容，已对本人身心健康、我父母的安全、我个人的行业声誉及个人人格尊严造成系统性伤害，并涉嫌侵犯本人及家人的个人隐私权益。

💬 Final The FDIC just told banks: “You don’t need our permission anymore—just do it right.” That’s a greenlight with accountability attached. We’re entering a new era of crypto-banking convergence. Are you ready? #FDIC #CryptoPolicy #DeFi #Tokenization #USbanks #Web3Finance

👀 Keep your eyes on: Which banks move first Stablecoin integration into banking rails FDIC guidance updates on custody, DeFi, staking Congressional reaction (if any) This is likely just the start.

📉 Contrast this with 2022: FDIC, OCC, Fed all tightened scrutiny Banks backed away after Silvergate/Signature/FUD Crypto = scary Now? The mood is shifting. Careful optimism. Pragmatic engagement.

🔁 Why this matters now: Market is maturing Institutions are ready to scale Tokenization and RWAs are heating up U.S. banks don’t want to fall behind Europe, Singapore, HK This clears a regulatory bottleneck that held back participation.

⚖️ Is this deregulation? Not quite. Banks still need to manage risk, follow existing laws, and maintain strong compliance. But it shifts the tone from “ask for permission” to “act responsibly and inform”. That’s a big difference in culture.

🔍 What does this mean in practice? Banks can now explore: Tokenized deposits Digital asset custody Blockchain-based payment rails Stablecoin-related infrastructure …all with more regulatory breathing room.

💬 FDIC Vice Chair Travis Hill: “We’re turning the page on a flawed approach… the past 3 years created uncertainty and discouraged innovation.” This isn’t just a bureaucratic change— It’s a signal.

📜 What’s new now? In FIL-7-2025, the FDIC has officially rescinded the old guidance. Now, banks can pursue crypto-related activities as long as: They're permitted under law, They have a robust risk management framework, They keep the FDIC informed, but not pre-cleared.

🕰️ What was the old rule? Under FIL-16-2022, banks were required to notify the FDIC in writing and wait for supervisory feedback before engaging in any crypto-related business. This created a chilling effect. Many banks just didn’t bother.

📢 Big regulatory shift in the U.S.: The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) just clarified that banks can now engage in certain crypto-related activities without needing prior written approval. This is a huge reversal from the prior stance.

🧵 FDIC just opened the door for U.S. banks to engage in crypto—without pre-approval. Let’s break down what changed, why it matters, and how it compares to the old policy. #FDIC #CryptoRegulation #DeFi #USbanks

Morph Black Card now trading at 1 ETH on @opensea ( https://t.co/ZfA3Qu6fOV) Mint was 0.2 ETH

$WAL supply APR on Navi now at 950%+

Corn airdrop checker now live

@HyperliquidX @okx @binance @CryptoHayes 💡 The lesson? DeFi = Permissionless ≠ Unbreakable Vaults need smarter safeguards. Liquidity ≠ Security. Meme markets ≠ predictable behavior. Next perpDEX to rise? Or same cycle, next victim? Let’s talk.

@HyperliquidX @okx @binance 🤔 Is Hyperliquid really “decentralized”? Arthur Hayes @CryptoHayes said it best: “Stop pretending Hyperliquid is decentralized… and stop pretending traders care.” Vaults can be gamed. Code can be clean, and still exploitable. Welcome to DegenFi.

@HyperliquidX @okx @binance $JELLY rose so high, the vault’s short exposure neared full liquidation. At $0.17, the vault’s $240M reserve could’ve been wiped out. Hyperliquid hit the brakes: Froze $JELLY trading Force-closed positions at $0.0095 Promised user refunds (if not linked to attackers)

@HyperliquidX @okx @binance 🧠 Design flaw or degen feature? Margin withdrawal logic ✅ Vault absorption logic ✅ Liquidation delay ✅ Oracle speed lag ✅ Low-liquidity token ✅ This was by the book. The problem is the book.

@HyperliquidX @okx @binance 🧵 So how did this happen—again? Because Hyperliquid’s vault acts as the forced counterparty. If you can: Manipulate margin Predict liquidation Control spot price… …you can print at the vault’s expense.