@Dyoung41290832 @johnsweeneyroar @snp Concessions were not enough. They could have offered more - for instance the ability to restrict immigration from EU for a limited period. We'd have never have implemented it, but the idea of being in control would have appeased many.

I then asked:

RT @DalrympleWill: If you read, and retweet, one post on Gaza this weekend let it be this.

They say they are concerned about Rangers fans being with the United fans, yet it was obvious who were Rangers fans sat around us and the stewards did nothing.

Not looking too good if you can’t even get your headline right 😂😂😂 Thought you were meant to be some mega mind?.

RT @HasVulcan: @SaulStaniforth Lest we forget other very respected politicians & their view of Israel.

When I explain to @bt_uk this is very hard to believe, I'm reminded they are a customer of Openreach and they've been let down too.

Asked why no one rang - first time they rang the landline (wrong one apparently) despite our mobiles being on the order. This time apparently they tried, but we have no missed calls on our mobiles.

We have security cameras so know who has been -strangely Openreach have so far failed to produce any evidence of attending.

Many @TheLawSociety members may hesitate to criticise the SRA's proposed approach publicly but would share their views with you. Conducting a quick poll could strengthen your representations to @LSB_EngandWal.

@guardian It suited the banks to do this as provided they all extended the amount they lent and continued to do so, it supported the higher prices. Higher prices mean larger mortgages, which means more interest and more profits for banks on each mortgage.

Here's an extract from a piece in the @guardian. The data on which it reports only goes back to 1999. If banks had maintained their traditional mortgage lending multiples and LTV percentages, I do not believe we would have seen this rise.

What the letter said was that:. In your letter you highlight that the £38bn figure used in the Conservative Party's publication includes costs beyond those provided by the civil service and published online by HM Treasury. The “your“ being the Labour party.

Nothing like using a pejorative term to make your point about equality.

what next - will we be told off for shouting too loud? I’ve sat in this area for over 30 years and seen the noise and passion in the section killed by over-zealous stewarding.

a steward taps me on my shoulder. I asked what he wanted. He wanted me to sit down! Was he kidding, no - he had a right strop on his face when I pointed out I wouldn’t be able to see with everyone stood in front of me and to my left. I carried out standing but.

There were many who supported the actions of the government, which is evident in the result of the 1997 election when the Tory government won over 40% of the popular vote. @BBC you can do better.

Starts out with misdescription of the strike which perhaps reveals the politics of the writer:

Of course the headline, once the link is clicked on is different:. Miners' strike 1984: Why UK miners walked out and how it ended.

is so weak. Just because a law or legal concept is old does not mean it is wrong. Freehold is just as old a concept. Laws against murder, theft etc are even older. Really a very poor piece of journalism all round.

And the argument below in the online article: