Ancap doggo🏴💛
@Ancap_doggo
Followers
442
Following
138
Media
36
Statuses
288
Anarcho capitalist🟡⚫ Revisionist Hoppean🚁 Ideological puritan NAPist
Ancapistan in my head
Joined June 2025
i have said it before and i will say it again, you get 0 deviations from the NAP it is inherently an absolute norm it is the most fundamental moral axiom in libertarian ethics, you do not just selectivly apply the NAP in any given circumstance because it makes you feal bad.
every time I think I have found the stupidest libertarian, there's a new entrant
6
1
21
You know the movement is fucked when the statement, the NAP is absolute is highly controversial among so called "libertarians".
2
2
12
RT @AlisDekay: Every libertarian would refuse to steal a ladder to save their mom from a burning building, and refuse to steal a penny to s….
0
2
0
If someone says “doing X is unjustified” but then does X anyway, they’re performing a direct clash between their stated moral framework and their chosen action. In praxeological terms, their revealed preference (the action they take) conflicts with their professed belief.
@Ancap_doggo @ACAgoristArmy @liquid2ulu @haleyinflorida No. The two can coexist. Praxeology is a preference in action, it is not be confused with ethics. A godly man can still commit the act of sex before marriage.
1
0
7
Either you care about the NAP or you dont there is no nuance there is no middle ground.
@xTheReapersSon @Ancap_doggo I’m a Christian first Libertarian second also, I think there are exceptions to violate the non-aggression principle because it’s that a law made by man It’s a great law. I think society should have this laws a general principle, but I think there are cases it should be violated.
1
2
7
David Friedman does not believe in natural law, he can’t be an ancap. "Libertarian" consequentialists have nothing to do with anarcho-capitalism. Anarcho capitalism will and allways be a legal theory.
"You are not an ancap because you don't follow my stupid cult, now I will argue about definitions, I am so smart"
7
1
24
RT @AlisDekay: Aggress now, Pay Later theories of libertarianism justify any crime on the basis of the so-called greater good. It's post-li….
0
6
0
RT @WarlinTopG: @Ancap_doggo "Yeah, I'll stand by my principles, except in the most important moments — there they don't matter".
0
2
0
A question for pragmatists: what is the difference, the fundamental difference, between the argument “stealing a ladder is justified because it would save my mom” and “the state taxing people is justified because it saves poor children from starving”?.
4
2
21
I wish I could get a collection of the amount of people who have claimed that the NAP is true and then proceeded to justify aggression or say that they would violate the NAP in any given circumstance.
I would violate the NAP in the heat of the moment if I couldn't find another way to save a person trapped in a burning building . I would also accept that I have to either plead to the mercy of the property owner or pay some form of restitution or consequence for the property.
2
0
12
The libertarian must be a radical precisely because he takes his stand on principle, and principle is an abstraction from reality that does not bend to pragmatic compromise. The choice is either liberty or coercion -Murray Rothbard.
Keep going bro. You're only a few more internet arguments away from achieving your anarcho-capitalist utopia. What you really need to focus on is fighting people 2% away from you. That will definitely achieve it.
0
1
10
Beliving that the NAP is absolute is what makes one an anarchist.
@Ancap_doggo @CptAncapistan @BngHotCoffee @NeolibertaereA I feel like you're not an actual anarchist. More like you some sort of douche trying to give Anarchists a bad name by being a total jackass.
3
1
21
. .
@Ancap_doggo @CptAncapistan @NeolibertaereA "you can just violate when its convenient ig". If it's worth it - yeah.
1
0
4
I take this as a compliment.
@Ancap_doggo @CptAncapistan @NeolibertaereA This is textbook libertarianism. And that’s not a compliment, I mean it’s libertarianism that can only exist in a textbook and in the real world is just retardation.
1
0
9