📢12 Key Facts Essential To Understanding The Chevron-Ecuador Litigation.

Check out video, photo and audio evidence of the massive fraud against Chevron in Ecuador.

A federal court found that Steven Donziger and his co-conspirators committed extortion, wire fraud, money laundering, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and other illegal and unethical acts in the lawsuit again Chevron in Ecuador.

TexPet fully met its environmental obligations. So, in 1998, Ecuador's government released the company from any future responsibility related to its former operations.

Videos, emails, falsified reports, sworn testimonies and ghostwritten rulings revealed that plaintiffs’ lawyers, backed by the Ecuadorian government, resorted to fraud, bribery and blackmail to obtain a judgment against Chevron in Ecuador.

Chevron filed a lawsuit in the U.S. under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, accusing Donziger and his co-conspirators of extortion and corruption. In 2014, the U.S. courts ruled that the judgment against Chevron in Ecuador was obtained by fraudulent.

How an international arbitration tribunal upheld the rule of law against a fraudulent multi-billion-dollar Ecuadorian judgement.

Discover the truth about Texaco’s operations and successful environmental remediation in Ecuador's Amazon.

In 2003, 48 plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against Chevron in Lago Agrio, Ecuador, claiming the company was responsible for environmental damage in the Amazon. The case turned out to be a fraud.

Discover how Chevron exposed the truth behind the "legal fraud of the century.".

Chevron’s fight for justice led to a historic arbitration ruling in the Hague.

Texaco met its obligations in Ecuador, yet state-owned Petroecuador failed to address the impacts it was responsible for in the Amazon.

Uncover the truth behind the fraudulent Lago Agrio case against Chevron and the corruption that fueled it.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys ghostwrote the final judgement in the Chevron Ecuador lawsuit. During testimony, the judge was unable to answer basic questions about the content of the judgement he claimed he wrote.

Texaco met its obligations in Ecuador. Petroecuador publicly acknowledged its responsibility for remaining environmental impacts yet took no action to remedy them.

“Stratus never determined that any individual actually became ill with cancer as a result of oil production.” -Douglas Beltman, plaintiffs’ environmental consultant in the Chevron Ecuador litigation.

TexPet was falsely accused of environmental damage. All credible scientific evidence at trial showed that sites remediated by TexPet posed no risk to health or the environment.

In the “legal fraud of the century”, plaintiffs’ lawyers promised $500K to an Ecuadorian judge to issue a ghostwritten judgment against Chevron.

In the Ecuador lawsuit against Chevron, plaintiffs’ lawyers submitted forged environmental expert reports falsely claiming that a multi-million dollar clean up was needed.

Learn how Steven Donziger and his team forged at least 20 of the 48 plaintiffs’ signatures in the fraudulent lawsuit again Chevron in Ecuador.

TexPet successfully remediated over 220 impacted sites, using methods and standards agreed upon with the Ecuadorian government.