RT @NHC_Atlantic: 11 pm ET Tue, Aug 19 Key Messages for Hurricane #Erin:. English: Español: .

What do you want to know?.

AimPoint vs. Traditional Reads: The Time Test. AimPoint gives faster reads with fewer footsteps. Traditional green reading takes 4-6x longer and over one second per footstep. Don’t believe the media narrative.

“Burn him! He read the slope with his FEET!” 🔥 @SkySportsGolf #ChillOutLads

RT @GolfMonthly: Putting performance coach @golfdonaldson explains the eight things the best putters do on the greens. Which one will you….

Hey ChatGPT: Is there evidence that PGA Tour players get better whey they start using AimPoint?

I watched 36 groups today at the Arnold Palmer Invitational, and not a single player plumb bobbed. Progress.

Podcast Episode 9 is out on both Apple and Spotify.

“AimPoint is not slowing down play.” - Mark Immelman.

Statistically the longest time between shots in a group comes from the tee box. The shortest are on the putting green. Feel free to read that again.

Putting conversion rates on PGA Tour over the last 10 years show a steadily increasing trend. False narratives about putting getting worse and worse just leads to conjecture based on a false premise. Decide for yourself:

Shotlink data shows no statistical difference between AimPoint and non-AimPoint players in how long they take to hit their putt when it’s their turn.

27% of all putts on PGA Tour are 2 feet or shorter with a make % of 99.8%. If you don’t want people walking near the cup then don’t make players putt these out. That’ll speed up play too.

RT @GolfSpyC: @megadkins_TFE Golfers are slow. not systems. No evidence that AimPoint causes pace of play issues. in fact, just the oppo….

Another look at the statistical improvement of 15 players who started AimPoint during their career. All 15 showed an improvement in average Strokes Gained Putting Ranking per tournament.

Your ability to hit your chosen landing spot on short game shorts will have a huge influence on how much the ball breaks.