@tmikov anyways, that list isn't important

@elvisxros It is interesting and indicative of the level of government competence (which is to be expected). I can't imagine the reasoning behind deciding that Python is somehow "safer" than JavaScript, or ignoring the tons of server and client apps driven by JS. The list is for languages…

@tmikov Cause it can’t keep the memory safe, duh. Where do you think those SharedArrayBuffers go off to at night!

@pcbzzz Yeah, we've been swamped with crashes caused by SharedArrayBuffer, an overwhelming total of zero. At this rate, we might just hit one by the next millennium.

@tmikov Why should it be on the list? 🤔

@DudeWhoCode Why is Python on the list?

@tmikov Will Static Hermes be any more or less safe btw?

@KaiSchroeder It is as safe for regular code. However it offers unsafe capabilities similarly to Rust or C#.

@tmikov Because the state plans the past, that’s because news comes to the center last.

@tmikov Or what about any other jvm languages? Or erlang or whatever. Trying to make a single page list of "safe" languages was never a good idea.

@tmikov I was wondering myself. JS does have an advantage to be embedded in every browser out there though so it's not like it's going anywhere.

@tmikov prototype pollution