A lot of crazy things have happened over the past 2.5 years ... but that so many people are simply accepting the conclusions of the Mueller report based on the word of an attorney general who wrote an unsolicited 19 page memo to DOJ bashing Mueller’s probe might be the craziest
The idea that any of us would take the word of Barr about the conclusions of Mueller’s report at face value, without seeing the underlying evidence, is practically surreal
And don’t get me started on media criticisms: have we all just collectively forgotten that more than a dozen Trump campaign aides met with Russian officials and virtually all of them lied about it. Or that Trump repeatedly & flagrantly tried to interfere w/the investigation
Were journalists simply supposed to ignore that? Were they supposed to ignore the fact that Trump’s son, campaign manager and son-in-law met with Russian officials promising dirt on Hillary Clinton (and lied about it) as if this wasn’t evidence of attempted collusion?
Do we all have collective amnesia over the president taking the word of Putin, repeatedly, over US Intel agencies on the question of Russian interference in the election?
And this guy ... who has literally spent his entire career screaming that practically everything said by a government official should be considered a lie running around spiking footballs based on the word of Bill Barr
I honestly don't think anyone has fully processed what a systemic & profound blow this collusion debacle is to the US media & its ability to lay any valid claim in the future to demanding trust & credibility. Just read that Taibbi piece to see how pervasive the recklessness was.
@speechboy71
I assume a lot of Democrats will disagree with Barr’s conclusion that Trump did not obstruct justice. But it beggars belief that the AG would lie about Mueller’s failure to find collusion. That would be a scandal in and of itself.
@speechboy71
@SentinelJust
What's bothers me most is how people are accepting collusion/conspiracy while not recognizing the deck was stacked when the definition was purposefully narrowed to "Russian Government". It's absurd to think Derapaska, Kilimnik or others operated outside Putin. There's no way.