@slbsn
slbsn
1 year
🚨BREAKING: The piece in The Lawyer on PL v City is excellent but paywalled ( https://t.co/3z08mTeFP2). It contains an important revelation tucked away at the end. "The Lawyer understands that any submissions over sanctions will take place following a finding on liability." This
12
43
254

Replies

@RealTolmie
The Real Tolmie's Hairdoo
1 year
@slbsn So an even higher bar for the Premier League if they have to establish fraud?
1
2
57
@slbsn
slbsn
1 year
@RealTolmie No - balance of probabilities.
5
2
18
@markbeau62
Mark
1 year
@slbsn @ben_rumsby Can the IC set the punishments. Or are they recommendions
1
0
0
@slbsn
slbsn
1 year
@markbeau62 @ben_rumsby It sets the sanctions (subject to appeal).
0
0
1
@RoyPaulBrother1
Newcastle 69 L.B.S.
1 year
@slbsn What would we do without Stefan, one sensible and informed voice in the baying pack chasing us.
0
0
12
@MCIKevn
Kev
1 year
@slbsn Can someone please summarize this like I’m 11??
6
0
4
@MohammedAston07
Mohammed A
1 year
@slbsn Thanks for the updates on the case. Much appreciated.
0
0
2
@DavidaTurris
Potentia Amoris
1 year
@slbsn In summary, all the paper talk about what sanctions arsenal & co. want is premature.
0
0
1
@Garyfromvegas
zlati
1 year
@slbsn Any chance of a summary?
0
0
1
@livermorej92
FPL CITY
1 year
@slbsn Who wants to remove the pay wall?? I've got a trick that always works 😂
3
0
0
@dannyrubin
daniel rubin
1 year
@slbsn To be fair commercial trials often split liability and quantum hearings and I guess it makes sense with the number of lawyers involved but surely they have dates pencilled in for it. Having said that if quantum hearing is necessary maybe we should hope that it’s not in the diary
1
0
0
@BscGemH7nter
Quaid
1 year
@slbsn Question; how come no one has picked up on this previously?🤯
1
0
0