@sideen_dan
Dan Sideen
6 months
How much additional wind + solar + storage would you need to eliminate coal+ gas from this grid? (Not to mention the additional future loads from the electrification of heating & transport)
Tweet media one
26
22
126

Replies

@MF17040593
MF
6 months
@sideen_dan What's your point? It obviously isn't that it's a major task because everyone knows that. Just as it's been a major task to create the grid we have now.
4
0
0
@sideen_dan
Dan Sideen
6 months
@MF17040593 The point is that it's an impossible task. Even Germany doesn't have enough money to do that.
5
1
22
@cvictordus
Christian Victor
6 months
@sideen_dan Are you really asking how much it takes from 34% to 100%? 😄
2
0
2
@sideen_dan
Dan Sideen
6 months
@cvictordus Math not your strong suite I see
2
0
3
@karsten_moeller
Karsten Möller
6 months
@sideen_dan Is there a way to ban all those unconstructive clowns who use cherry-picked hours to try to make points about systems that run 8760h a year? Yes, there is a lot of work to do. And sunless winter-morning weekdays are probably the hardest to decarbonize, thanks Mr Obvious.
1
0
1
@heslep
Mark Heslep
6 months
@sideen_dan @chrispydog Nick Touran has done a “do the math”, graphical explanation for a 100% all energy replacement via a solar+storage case for CA. Method applies anywhere. Ex: Increase solar generation 20X, install 700 GWh of storage, for a daily case only.
0
0
0
@IntermittentNRG
intermittent.energy
6 months
@sideen_dan It's mostly a storage problem. There's large gaps with little output
@IntermittentNRG
intermittent.energy
8 months
🇩🇪Germany Wind🌪️ and ☀️Solar Aug 2022 to Oct 2023
12
95
220
3
1
11
@baldwinbiogas
John Baldwin
6 months
@sideen_dan No issue!
1
0
0
@video4me
Stephen B. Streater
6 months
@sideen_dan You're asking the wrong question. Like how many cyclists with dynamos on their bikes would it take for Germany to eliminate coal and gas? Try this question: How much renewables does Europe need to eliminate coal and gas? And how much interconnect does Germany need?
0
0
0
@cornoisseur
Michael McLean
6 months
@sideen_dan Don’t worry, one more transmission line bro!
0
0
3
@JohnLovell60
John Lovell
6 months
@sideen_dan This is the article that convinced me that 100% RE is futile:
0
0
3
@nwdiver93
Chris
6 months
@sideen_dan ~3x more to eliminate ~90%.
Tweet media one
2
0
0
@JBFrom0z
🖤💛❤️Proud west aussie 🖤💛❤️
6 months
@sideen_dan I understand heating is being addressed using more direct methods, storing heat and distributing to communities is already well established in many places. Thus the daytime excess can be timeshifted
0
0
0
@zahnatom
zahnatom
6 months
@sideen_dan It's flat out impossible. But ohhnooo nuclear scarrryyyyy I'm losing my mind
0
0
2
@Dardedar
Dardedar
6 months
@sideen_dan "Eliminate" is the common strawman. The last 10% is hardest. 90% gone by 2050 or earlier will do the job. Doable with today's tech, never mind what will be coming along.
2
0
6
@trek0709
trek79
6 months
@sideen_dan In Germany we constantly hear how cheap renewables are. Yet our utilities bills tell a different story. In few countries people pay more. When you factor in backup power for when renewables are not producing, the total cost is high. And it isn't even working in the end.
0
0
0
@Kai_Brueggemann
Kai Brüggemann
6 months
@sideen_dan As a physicist I tend to say: Lim -> infinite
0
0
0
@Elschabat
maTze
6 months
@sideen_dan nobody told us the solution
0
0
0
@MrJSchumpeter
Joseph Schumpeter
6 months
@sideen_dan You need to look at an interconnected grid, across a continent with plenty of cables running over wide space.
0
0
0
@missingmass1
Alan Neale
6 months
@sideen_dan Burning FF is finite so renewables have to be used at some point. A balanced grid is needed or smaller populations of humans and less stuff is needed.
0
0
0