And the German nightmare continues. No solar, wind at 1.5% capacity and CO2 intensity at an incredibly bad 711 gm/CO2.
Surely the Germans will soon come to their senses?
49
103
363
Replies
@sideen_dan
You do know that its not momentary values we need to fix, but long time averages, right?
Their caol-use this year is record low.
Come to their senses, how? They made economical sound decisions - not for the climate, so no.
5
0
5
@sideen_dan
@ture99__
Wrong. That's 711 gCO2eq/kWh. Use correct units.
It means 711 grams of CO2 equivalents per produced kilowatthour.
1
0
1
@sideen_dan
Just a little perspective that if Germany stopped consuming coal, China alone would offset that consumption in one month. It's cheaper for Germany to burn coal than import additional French nuclear.
1
0
0
@jar61354
That may well be true, but that certainly wasn't the point of The Energiewende. Not to mention the half trillion euros spent to lower German CO2 emissions
1
0
2
@sideen_dan
CO2 hardly matters but they are hypocrites for pretending it did in the first place, and they are doing serious damage to land and air quality
0
0
4
@sideen_dan
German domestic production is running 848 g rather than just 711, as it's not watered down by imported power.
1
2
20
@sideen_dan
No, I think the Canadastans coming to their senses has a better chance than the Germans coming to their senses.
0
0
3
@sideen_dan
The worldwide goal is to duplicate what Germany attempted & expect a different result.
0
0
6
@sideen_dan
Yeah choose a little snapshot and ignore averages to score cheap points on Twitter. PATHETIC!
1
0
3
@sideen_dan
electricity maps is a useless tool until it actually takes into account all available data or displays large warnings when it is making huge assumptions based on absent data.
@VeroWendland
Bitte posten Sie keine Grafiken von
@ElectricityMaps
mit Daten, die "Geschätzt" sind. In diesem Fall fehlt die komplette Erzeugung von Wind onshore.
35
93
996
0
0
3
@sideen_dan
Tell it to me like I'm 5...isn't CO2 what the plants (who we, as humans, desperately need to survive) feed on? Reducing what they need to live wouldn't bring their number down? Is common sense out of the window in every climate hoax advocate?
0
0
2
