@regissphilbin That means simply adding everything after Game Changers. Are seasons 35~39 really worth it? 🤣

@lampshades120 I mean there are a ton of great characters in that stretch… but also where did I say only 35-39?

@regissphilbin that would be perfect because i dont want there to be more new era returnees than pre new era returnees

@regissphilbin i need returnees from 35-39

@regissphilbin Exactly! I was thinking they do this same thing but for 49 and 50 back to back but it is what it is

@regissphilbin That’s how it should be

@regissphilbin Yeah I'm still hoping s49 is returnees also because I'm very worried for the possible season 50 cast because for season 50 I want the best of the best. There's so many players I want to see return that wouldn't quite make a s50 season. I'm very curious as to what it ends up being

@regissphilbin This

@regissphilbin Agreed

@regissphilbin well no

@regissphilbin Just because 50 is confirmed returning players doesn’t mean 48 or 49 can’t. I kind of think they will do new era all stars at 49 then Old school vs new School 50

@regissphilbin THIS

@regissphilbin Or 49-50. No returnee season for 4 years then 2 in a row if we're going back to only newbies afterwards

@regissphilbin You deserve this hit tweet for saying this

@regissphilbin girl yes!!

@regissphilbin id love for the 30s icons to get a chance

@regissphilbin same cause i don’t want them to do a all stars in survivor 50 with actual all stars and returns from new era they need to be separate

@regissphilbin I would say 35-current for 48. And then all runners up on #Survivor50 @JeffProbst @survivorcbs