I like being a scientist, but I don't want to see my kids pursue it as a career! That's because it's so difficult for people to find stable long-term employment as a scientist, especially as an academic.
“If this experiment has brought a wormhole into actual physical existence, then a strong case could be made that you, too, bring a wormhole into actual physical existence every time you sketch one with pen and paper.”
-Scott Aaronson, UT Austin
Of course that's your contention. You're a first year grad student. You just got finished readin' some Nature paper about variational algorithms --LANL group probably. You're gonna be convinced of that 'til next month when you read HLL, and then ...
I'm recruiting for multiple postdoc positions with me at
@QuantumIQC
! The ideal candidates will be excited about some of: Shannon theory, entanglement, physics of information, metrology, fancy math, quantum networks, QI in AMO/CM/HEP, the fundamental nature of reality, etc...
I am glad to see this. 9 out of 10 quantum computing researchers will agree with the sentiments in private, but they usually find it best not to do so publicly.
This is such a toxic and misleading article. It’s propaganda for the con men (and con women). Its victims are students.
“The future is quantum: universities look to train engineers for an emerging industry”
Please stop publishing lies like this
@nature
!
Financial applications, such as risk management, as well as materials science and logistics optimization also have a high chance of benefiting from quantum computation in the near term, says Biercuk.
Has anyone heard reasonable objections to the many worlds interpretation of QM?
It's clearly the best interpretation, so I'd assume none exist, but just double-checking.
I took a quick look at the dwave paper. It's the usual story: they present the device as though it's doing a noiseless evolution, when we know there's very high decoherence. They argue that simulating the noiseless evolution from first principles is hard
When Anton Zeilinger received the award, he said, “My advice would be: Do what you find interesting, and don’t care too much about possible applications.”
In 200 years, they won't remember who built the first useful quantum computer, what error correcting code it used, or what algorithm it ran. They will remember
@preskill
and
@PeterShor1
as twin bards of the early quantum age.
Title: Postdoc positions in quantum information at JILA
We anticipate openings for postdoctoral positions in theoretical quantum information beginning in Fall 2022 or thereafter. Successful candidates will join the group of Graeme Smith at JILA and CU Boulder.
Quantum hype and disinformation are damaging the field and misdirecting resources. But how do we measure quantum hype? As a first step to answering this question, I propose to establish some natural units to capture a typical instance of quantum nonsense.
Within 10-20 years, nearly every branch of science will be, for all intents and purposes, a branch of computer science.
Computational physics, comp chemistry, comp biology, comp medicine... Even comp archeology. Realistic simulations, big data analysis, and ML everywhere
I think in the case of quantum computing the field is in the process of fracturing into a bullshit-focused corporate-driven component and an evidence-based academic component. These are increasingly disconnected as the corporate component severs ties with reality.
Sent this to my group slack and thought it might be useful for others too:
Since many of you are going to QIP next week, I want to give some advice on how to make the most of attending. Please remember that this is a business trip, ultimately paid for by taxpayers to...
Much like people, I think quantum mechanics must want, more than anything else, to simply be understood.
SO MAYBE IT COULD THROW US A FUCKING BONE ONCE IN A WHILE
Some discussion on mastodon that I'll cross-post here.
QIP has inherited from CS a fetish for complication. It is our job as reviewers and PC members to fight the fallacy that simple-->trivial and complicated-->deep.
From today, the majority of foreign university students cannot bring family members to the UK.
In 2024, we’re already delivering for the British people.
@GoogleQuantumAI
Would you please work towards reducing the amount of misinformation/disinformation about quantum computers that your team spreads?
Will you apologize about the wormhole debacle?
@tdietterich
@TaliaRinger
@mmitchell_ai
@ErikWhiting4
@arxiv
arXiv is a cancer that promotes the dissemination of junk "science" in a format that is indistinguishable from real publications. And promotes the hectic "can't keep up" + "anything older than 6 months is irrelevant" CS culture.
>>
@JohnHolbein1
Usually interested institutions will get in touch with you to make offers as you're writing up your thesis. If you want a job at your PhD intuition, stop by the chair's office to let them know.
Wow!
@markwilde
was named IEEE Fellow
@ieee_itsoc
"for contributions to the relative-entropy framework and theorems for quantum communications "
Congratulations to Mark and to
@IEEEorg
!
Ban teaching Critical Phenomena in graduate school! Physics professors are trying to renormalize your children and teach them about universality classes!
Many experimental teams have flirted with quantum error correction. Perhaps 2024 will be the year someone goes out for coffee with quantum error correction.
It really is hard to see how degraded the environment at IBM Research has become. This is a place that had a hand in discovering the foundations of quantum computing and information. Where Landauer, Bennett, DiVincenzo, Smolin, Terhal all stood up to phonies.
@Travis_Sch
This paper has lost IBM a lot of respect in the community - you can’t spin this away. Had it been posted on arXiv first the limitations of your classical comparison would have been discussed/exposed prior to publication, so why not?
It is not worth steering young people into an extremely speculative area for the sake of saving these companies a few dollars. A broad education in CS/Engineering/Physics is far more valuable than (say) majoring in a “quantum information science” program.
'I cannot seriously believe in [quantum mechanics] because the theory cannot be reconciled with the idea that physics should represent a reality in space and time, free from spooky actions at a distance.'
-Albert Einstein to Max Born
March 3, 1947
#histSTM
Boulder School 2018: Quantum Information! It runs July 2-27. Lectures by Aaronson, Alicea, Bollinger, Brandão, Christandl, DiVincenzo, Gottesman, Haah, Martinis, Regal, Renner, Swingle, Terhal, Troyer, Verstraete, and Ye. Deadline is Monday January 15
Happy to announce my quantum virtual reality start-up, QARK, is exiting stealth mode today! Can't wait to disrupt the VR/AR space with the power of quantum computers! Stay tuned!!!