@poverty_action
Innovations for Poverty Action
5 years
Q from @deankarlan : do people make too much about what nudges can do? Kahneman: everybody is excited about being right on the direction of the hypothesis, but ignore the magnitude of the effect, which is often quite small, or comes with very high variance
Tweet media one
4
24
40

Replies

@poverty_action
Innovations for Poverty Action
5 years
Daniel Kahneman: when making predictions beware, because confidence and accuracy are uncorrelated
Tweet media one
3
40
75
@poverty_action
Innovations for Poverty Action
5 years
Currently thinking about noise in judgement, often quite large even among professionals "Wherever you have human judgement you will have noise"
1
0
9
@poverty_action
Innovations for Poverty Action
5 years
Your final judgement shouldn't be given to a human it should be the algorithm, except in very rare circumstances. When people overrule the algorithm, they're usually wrong.
0
2
10
@dsaava
Dmitry Saava
5 years
@poverty_action @deankarlan Will there be a video available anywhere?
1
0
0
@poverty_action
Innovations for Poverty Action
5 years
@dsaava @deankarlan Hi (& cc @RGoyal02 ) unfortunately there's no recording, but many of the themes discussed were similar to this interview with @R_Thaler and his podcast interview with @tylercowen
1
0
3
@FCDOREDGCSD
FCDO Gov,Conflict,SocDev Research
5 years
@poverty_action @deankarlan Yes. A perpetual disappointment in public policy research is the small size of many significant +ve effects. We need to keep reminding policy makers of this awkward 'it works!' factoid. 《Muted Eureka!》Archimedes lost the top few inches of his bathwater, not the whole lot.
1
1
5
@OlivierSterck
Olivier Sterck
5 years
@poverty_action @deankarlan In line with Kahneman's thoughts, I propose a new approach to assess the economic importance of regressors in a recent CSAE working paper
0
0
0