.@eulerfinance dominates lending protocol efficiency! At a 3.5% fee-to-TVL ratio, Euler shows superior ability to generate fees from locked capital. That's 2x more efficient than @Aave and 1.5x higher than @compoundfinance. The data shows a clear pattern: mid-size protocols
6
4
40
Replies
1/ The numbers tell the story: ✦ @Eulerfinance: 3.5% ratio on $1.5B TVL ✦ @KaminoFinance: 2.9% ratio on $3.1B TVL ✦ @Aave: 1.7% ratio on $68B TVL Limited supply drives higher rates. Euler charges premiums in focused risk segments. Aave competes broadly, pressuring rates
2
0
3
2/ Why this matters? Higher fee efficiency translates to better yields for lenders. Protocols that generate 3.5% fees can offer more competitive rates than those at 1.7%. The efficiency gap suggests specialization with protocols serving different risk appetites. Euler's
0
0
5
0
0
0
@objectivedefi @eulerfinance @aave @compoundfinance Efficiency > size Euler proves that smart design beats sheer scale. 2x Aave, 1.5x Compound — mid-size protocols showing the real edge in DeFi.”
0
0
0
@objectivedefi @eulerfinance @aave @compoundfinance Are the fees netted (fees minus rewards paid in protocol tokens)? Since fees can be high when protocols can compensate users for high borrowing rates by paying their tokens as rewards.
0
0
0