NetChoice Profile Banner
NetChoice Profile
NetChoice

@NetChoice

Followers
3,876
Following
331
Media
939
Statuses
9,068

We fight to make the internet safe for free enterprise and free expression.

Washington, DC
Joined May 2009
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
Pinned Tweet
@NetChoice
NetChoice
3 months
NetChoice Grateful to Defend the First Amendment at the Supreme Court WASHINGTON—Today, NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) had oral arguments in our landmark cases against the states of Texas and Florida, NetChoice & CCIA v. Paxton and Moody
Tweet media one
1
10
17
@NetChoice
NetChoice
6 hours
If APRA and KOSA are passed, they will fail to accomplish their stated goals—leaving Americans with a false sense of safety and security online.  NetChoice remains dedicated to working with policymakers to appropriately tackle these critical issues.
1
6
6
NetChoice Retweeted
@ceidotorg
Competitive Enterprise Institute
10 hours
Along with indirectly limiting free speech, repealing Section 230 would decimate small tech firms. "Curtailing Section 230 will ensure that only those companies already big and rich enough to pay legal-defense bills will survive." @melugin_p @WSJ
0
3
6
@NetChoice
NetChoice
1 day
The NRA v. Vullo decision should send a strong message for the NetChoice & @ccianet cases, too, writes @ChrisMarchese9 : "Government efforts to dictate editorial policies—whether through formal statutes or backroom pressure—are unconstitutional. Period."
0
1
6
NetChoice Retweeted
@moflatley
Maureen Flatley
2 days
This is not just about tech companies. Outside groups on the Left and Right, privacy and child welfare experts & Constitutional scholars have all expressed serious concerns. Those concerns are not going away. #OPPOSEKOSA
1
9
16
@NetChoice
NetChoice
2 days
Today’s Supreme Court decision in NRA v. Vullo is a validation of NetChoice's ongoing efforts to protect free speech and prevent governmental overreach, writes @ChrisMarchese9 :
Tweet media one
0
0
11
@NetChoice
NetChoice
2 days
Given that First Amendment scholars, family-values conservatives and internet rights groups have all sounded the alarm about KOSA’s censorship issues, the bill’s supporters must seriously engage with these concerns and stop ignoring them.
0
11
12
@NetChoice
NetChoice
2 days
0
3
5
@NetChoice
NetChoice
2 days
If the allegations from Johansson are substantiated, OpenAI would likely face significant consequences under existing laws. There’s no reason existing laws can’t be applied effectively to misuse of AI-generated content—without adding more red tape.
0
0
1
@NetChoice
NetChoice
2 days
Biden's FTC can't seem to get its facts straight. Congress should continue its robust oversight of the agency, which under Chair Khan's leadership has thwarted its responsibility to protect consumer welfare.
0
0
0
@NetChoice
NetChoice
3 days
A "sunset" (repeal) of Section 230 would have devastating consequences, especially for small tech companies trying to stay competitive and online speech. It's crucial to protect this key pillar of the internet.
0
0
0
@NetChoice
NetChoice
3 days
Policymakers should firmly reject Biden's antitrust overreach, conduct oversight of the agencies misusing their authority, and put American consumers back where they belong: at the center of antitrust analysis and enforcement.
0
0
0
@NetChoice
NetChoice
3 days
If passed, KOSA would establish a “Kids Online Safety Council,” an advisory body that could easily be politicized to censor speech disliked by the government. This creates a perfect storm for the suppression of legitimate speech.
0
2
3
NetChoice Retweeted
@CarlSzabo
Carl Szabo
3 days
If you thought "double speak" was only in Orwellian books, you haven't seen the latest from the Biden FTC. @WSJEditorials outlines how the latest from the Biden FTC's case against Amazon makes even less sense. FTC Chair Khan claims that Amazon keeps prices too high while
0
8
11
@NetChoice
NetChoice
3 days
FTC Chair Khan can't seem to get her facts straight in her attacks against Amazon—perhaps because "most evidence contradicts her claims." @WSJopinion 's Editorial Board today on "Lina Khan's Amazon Antitrust Paradox":
0
1
1
@NetChoice
NetChoice
3 days
0
3
3
NetChoice Retweeted
@WSJopinion
Wall Street Journal Opinion
4 days
Booksellers want to join Lina Khan’s lawsuit against Amazon, but the FTC Chair doesn’t want them contradicting her arguments in court. What does it say when her own supporters disagree with her dubious legal theories?
0
3
6
@NetChoice
NetChoice
3 days
The Biden administration's shift away from consumer needs is driving up inflation, hurting businesses, undermining America's global competitiveness, and wasting taxpayer money. This anti-consumer approach is unsustainable.
0
0
1