A quick analysis of the Reaper vs. UAP video that was shared today by @RepEricBurlison It looks like the object could be very slow-moving. There does not seem to be any clear evidence of anything anomalous happening.

What on earth do you mean by "ineffective against the target", @RepEricBurlison? It severely disables the target, leaving it tumbling in the air with bits knocked off it. It's at 12,000 feet. The MQ-9 is at 24,000 feet and 250mph. The apparent remaining motion is parallax.

If by "zero effect" you mean "broken into several pieces and left tumbling through the air as the apparent motion continues only due to parallax," then sure.

Nuccetelli, at the UFO hearing: "There is no evidence."

Preliminary analysis. By the length of the motion blur of the waves, the tracking speed increases after the collision. This indicates the target was previously moving in the same direction as the tracking drone. After collision it quickly falls to near zero air speed.

New UFO video presented in congressional testimony. It's not entirely clear, but it looks like they are tracking a "GoFast"-type object with a lot of parallax. A missile clips it, and the debris appears to keep going because of the parallax.

Nuccetelli "made sure nobody had been abducted" after seeing a UFO over his house. and UFOs "come down and investigate you" These incredible stories lack any evidence and are not a good look.

Two UFO sightings. Wiggins: No pushback at all Borland: years of harassment What's the difference here?

Borland describes an amazing encounter with a giant glowing triangle at a military base for 15 MINUTES. Nobody else noticed it.

Borland recounts his UFO sighting and the subsequent problems he feels this caused him. Unfortunately, he just comes across as a bit paranoid. But without actual evidence, that's how it will go. Stories are not going to cut it.

UFO video playing in a congressional committee. Does nothing like the prior testimony described.

George Knapp still thinks Bob Lazar is legit. This testimony is like a recap of a Coast-to-Coast AM special.

I agree with Chief Wiggins that UAP reporting should be encouraged and allowed. And that better training be given for recording UAP events.

Again, we have a cool story, but no good video. Story: A Glowing craft flies out of the Ocean, linking up with other objects and zooms away. Video: a blurry blob that does nothing This is a common pattern.

A "30-foot sphere of light" hovered over his house. This will not help his credibility.

Nuccetelli reports on a "giant glowing red square" and other amazing UFO sightings, like a "massive triangular craft" Why are there no good photos or videos? Why just stories?

Titus just said the house committee is discussing "paranormal topics" like on Coast-to-Coast AM.

I very much support @RepJasmine's statement that pilots and military personnel should be able to report UFOs without fear of recrimination. Let's figure out what is going on.

Why are all the "best" UFO videos from the military just blurry blobs that do nothing interesting? It's because of the LIZ (the Low Information Zone). If the video were clearer, then we could tell what it was. That's how UFOs work.

This is NOT saying UFO witnesses are mentally ill. They are the normal mixture of people. People's brains are different. Some people can't mentally "see" anything. Some people have no inner dialogue. These are HUGE differences, but people don't talk about the consequences.